|
Post by Wes on Jan 29, 2011 17:38:50 GMT 10
BLACK TRIANGLE UFO CROSSES LUNAR SURFACE JAN 2011
I would think this was something closer to the camera Except it seems to leave a shadow on the Luna surface.
|
|
|
Post by alienbeing on Jan 29, 2011 22:06:15 GMT 10
i just uploaded this vid from ufos hard evidence sts48 mission. taken a screenshot from it. coincidence ;D
|
|
|
Post by Wes on Jan 29, 2011 23:29:24 GMT 10
|
|
|
Post by Wes Gear on Jan 29, 2011 23:45:10 GMT 10
What ever it was looked like it was in a shallow orbit around the moon. Meaning that it wasn't under power at the time but letting natural physics do the work. So now you have to factor in that it could be any of several orbiting satellites with their solar panels opened. The crunch effect of the telescope looking at something that far away could easily give a false impression of shape and size.
|
|
|
Post by Wes on Jan 30, 2011 1:04:50 GMT 10
Good call Jessie never thought of it being a satellite in orbit around the Moon.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2011 7:08:07 GMT 10
This looks similar, but the TR-3A was never designed for space travel, so it could be something new. I keep saying this, America, the military especially, would never be without a craft to get them and thier cargo into space, they would never retire the space shuttle without a ready, all be it secret, replacement.
|
|
|
Post by brillbilly on Jan 30, 2011 21:53:58 GMT 10
i think the shadows not right if the only light is the sun? That craft would have to be dam close to the luna surface for the shadow to appear like that? i,m 50/50 on this being CGI just my opinion but it could be real and a long way from home?
|
|
|
Post by Wes on Jan 30, 2011 22:36:48 GMT 10
Yeah Brill after watching this a few more times I agree that something doesn't look right with the shadow. Or should I say shadows. At 6 seconds you can see, well it looks like, two shadows. The one that moves and one that seems to be under the object all the time.
|
|
|
Post by brillbilly on Jan 30, 2011 22:50:05 GMT 10
Yeah Brill after watching this a few more times I agree that something doesn't look right with the shadow. Or should I say shadows. At 6 seconds you can see, well it looks like, two shadows. The one that moves and one that seems to be under the object all the time. hi wez ,sent you something,lol i just dont see how the shadow can start at the front and move to the back if the only sorce of light is the sun! i just dont look right
|
|
|
Post by Wes Gear on Jan 30, 2011 23:58:28 GMT 10
I saw the same argument at dtv about it being cgi. They were wrong. The shadow is fine. What everyone is missing is the fact the object was moving exactly as it should to be a satellite. It would take a master special fx master to duplicate that movement and speed. A dumbass like the guy who the vid belongs couldn't do it.
Not cgi. Just a lucky shot of a lunar satellite.
|
|