Post by concrete on Sept 5, 2010 20:42:47 GMT 10
Well actually I seriously doubt it.
But, that is exactly what food industry lobbiests will declare ater reading this.
'See, mister law maker. It not the hormones affecting the children. It's evolution'
www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/08/100831121437.htm
I dunno. This still doesnt quite explain to me why 10yr old girls are wearing 'C' cups.
I know this topic has been talked about before. But, I thought that more info about something is always better than no info.
But, that is exactly what food industry lobbiests will declare ater reading this.
Girls who physically mature earlier tend to start dating, have sexual intercourse at a younger age, and have more sexual partners than girls who develop later. That puts them at risk of sexually transmitted diseases and makes them more likely to have a child while they're still teenagers. These are generally seen as bad things, says Jay Belsky, of Birkbeck University in London, given that many psychologists and doctors think there are right and wrong ways to develop. But he says it makes more sense to look at development the way nature does -- from an evolutionary perspective. This leads to the expectation that growing up in a risky, unstable environment -- the kind that fosters an insecure rather than secure attachment of infant to mother -- should accelerate pubertal maturation thus increasing the chances that one could reproduce before they die.
'See, mister law maker. It not the hormones affecting the children. It's evolution'
Results revealed, as predicted, that girls who were insecure as babies started their pubertal development sooner -- by about two to four months -- than girls who were secure as babies. They also completed pubertal development sooner and had their first period earlier than girls who were secure as infants.
www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/08/100831121437.htm
I dunno. This still doesnt quite explain to me why 10yr old girls are wearing 'C' cups.
I know this topic has been talked about before. But, I thought that more info about something is always better than no info.