Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2012 8:22:33 GMT 10
Ok, Now you all know I'm not a big fan of this section. Also am no longer a big fan of Unexplainable.net, for obvious God loving reasons these days. But just a quick look at this story does raise some interesting questions.......... www.unexplainable.net/political-conspiracies/cnbc-published-eric-holder-and-bankers-43-trillion-lawsuit-and-kids-get-murdered.phpNow a cynic might say the story of this lawsuit has been around for a long while and CNBC's reporting on it is not really big news. However, it is interesting to note that the story was removed. But......and its a big BUT......I'm not sure this is how silencing people works. If you want to silence someone you THREATEN to harm thier families, you dont kill them first, it risks turning your intended silencee into a crusader who has nothing left to lose. I may have negated my own arguement there, but still its an interesting connection.
|
|
|
Post by boxfree on Oct 29, 2012 11:32:39 GMT 10
|
|
|
Post by Wes Gear on Oct 29, 2012 14:08:11 GMT 10
NEW YORK, Oct. 25, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- Spire Law Group, LLP's national home owners' lawsuit, pending in the venue where the "Banksters" control their $43 trillion racketeering scheme (New York) – known as the largest money laundering and racketeering lawsuit in United States History and identifying $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000,000.00) of laundered money by the "Banksters" and their U.S. racketeering partners and joint venturers – now pinpoints the identities of the key racketeering partners of the "Banksters" located in the highest offices of government and acting for their own self-interests.
In connection with the federal lawsuit now impending in the United States District Court in Brooklyn, New York (Case No. 12-cv-04269-JBW-RML) – involving, among other things, a request that the District Court enjoin all mortgage foreclosures by the Banksters nationwide, unless and until the entire $43 trillion is repaid to a court-appointed receiver – Plaintiffs now establish the location of the $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000,000.00) of laundered money in a racketeering enterprise participated in by the following individuals (without limitation): Attorney General Holder acting in his individual capacity, Assistant Attorney General Tony West, the brother in law of Defendant California Attorney General Kamala Harris (both acting in their individual capacities), Jon Corzine (former New Jersey Governor), Robert Rubin (former Treasury Secretary and Bankster), Timothy Geitner, Treasury Secretary (acting in his individual capacity), Vikram Pandit (recently resigned and disgraced Chairman of the Board of Citigroup), Valerie Jarrett (a Senior White House Advisor), Anita Dunn (a former "communications director" for the Obama Administration), Robert Bauer (husband of Anita Dunn and Chief Legal Counsel for the Obama Re-election Campaign), as well as the "Banksters" themselves, and their affiliates and conduits. The lawsuit alleges serial violations of the United States Patriot Act, the Policy of Embargo Against Iran and Countries Hostile to the Foreign Policy of the United States, and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (commonly known as the RICO statute) and other State and Federal laws.
PR Newswire s.tt/1r0wJ
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 29, 2012 14:42:47 GMT 10
I havnt been following this story BF, but it seems to me there's an awful lot of Obama people on that list, not many Bush people, whos watch it was when all this shit occured. This isnt a Tea Party witch hunt is it?
|
|
|
Post by boxfree on Oct 30, 2012 9:27:50 GMT 10
I havnt been following this story BF, but it seems to me there's an awful lot of Obama people on that list, not many Bush people, whos watch it was when all this shit occured. This isnt a Tea Party witch hunt is it? Let me put it this way... The bailouts of these banks and insurers was done by both parties agreeing to fund them with our tax dollars. There was 'no vote' or referendum and action was taken without the peoples approval. There were no guarantees made by the banks that they had to provide badly needed loans to small business's or lower the bar to get those loans. People are pissed off and rightly so. But to point a finger at this administration for the need to bailout these scum fucks is ludicrous when it was the last administration fault for getting us in the predicament in the first place. Laughable if not so tragic . So yeah ....there is a lot of the pot calling the kettle black here....or "there's a black man in the White House"
|
|
|
Post by brillbilly on Oct 31, 2012 1:27:27 GMT 10
Quote; There was 'no vote' or referendum and action was taken without the peoples approval.
That about sums up your corrupt Goverment and most world Goverments including UK bunch of inbreds.
|
|