|
Post by Wes Gear on Feb 1, 2011 6:40:06 GMT 10
Brill I understand you know nothing of focal lengths and how they can distort size, shape and distance. I understand that you hold the wrong belief that objects can travel like a satellite under power. I also accept that since I question your beliefs in world conspiracies that it is only fair you question something from me.
The difference is I know what I'm talking about. ;D
|
|
|
Post by brillbilly on Feb 1, 2011 7:31:30 GMT 10
Brill I understand you know nothing of focal lengths and how they can distort size, shape and distance. I understand that you hold the wrong belief that objects can travel like a satellite under power. I also accept that since I question your beliefs in world conspiracies that it is only fair you question something from me. The difference is I know what I'm talking about. ;D lol! and as usual you reply by belittling my opinion by insinuating i know fuck all and end it with your usual opinionated final word! "so yes its a satilight because you say it is? happy now. even im wondering what the hell the point is partaking in OCB at times,when your so against most topics "Its a hobby mate"! but you can make it bloody hard work at times. "knowing what you can be like with your opinions"! just because you say so! is no competion for me your stance is.................... you know better! so leave it at that! thanks ps A few space probes have been placed into orbit around other bodies and become artificial satellites to the Moon, Venus, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn. Satellites are used for a large number of purposes. Common types include military and civilian Earth observation satellites, communications satellites, navigation satellites, weather satellites, and research satellites. Space stations and human spacecraft in orbit are also satellites. Satellite orbits vary greatly, depending on the purpose of the satellite, and are classified in a number of ways. Well-known (overlapping) classes include low Earth orbit, polar orbit, and geostationary orbit. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satellite
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 1, 2011 11:42:45 GMT 10
Look I'm on my phone so I can't go pic hunting but a fucking satellite with its solar panels opened would look like a triangle. Don't forget that unlike viewing an Earth satellite where you would look up and see it from bottom to top a lunar satellite would be viewed top to bottom. The unique way the moon is lit by the sun would cause the shadows that everyone seems stuck on. Forget that the OBJECT itself is moving exactly like a satellite let's focus on the shadow.......come guys get your heads out your ass. You're looking at a shadow of something traveling very fast above the lunar surface where the shadow is almost washed out by the same light source that created it. Think about it. If this was cgi the guy would have slowed it down. These stupid fucks are too proud of their amateurish attempts to fake something to make it whiz by that fast. Again......shadow is in line with the lighting of the moon. Or you can believe it's an American craft that we love to fly around the moon so every telescope in the world could see us. Oh and we do it at an altitude that puts us at risk of colliding with lunar satellites. Yeah that sounds sane. QUICK EVEYONE POINT AT THE CIA REPTILIAN DISINFO AGENT
|
|
|
Post by Wes Gear on Feb 1, 2011 13:59:26 GMT 10
And again I'm the villain for having the balls to post with conviction when I know I'm on the right track. Had I posted with as much zeal agreeing with some of the more absurd conspiracies I'd be a hero. A misguided, uninformed and naïve hero but a hero all the same.
We do agree on one thing my friend. I keep asking myself what am I doing here and would I be better served moving on to other things since I truly do not believe in 90% of this stuff. These days I find the gulf between the rich and poor to be more troublesome than weeding through conspiracies looking for a nugget of truth.
|
|
|
Post by sammysamm89 on Feb 1, 2011 14:16:13 GMT 10
These days I find the gulf between the rich and poor to be more troublesome than weeding through conspiracies looking for a nugget of truth. And there would be your nitch Jessie. Because if there weren't people doing that we could all just go to hell in a hand bag with the rest of them and not give a shit. I constantly feel like I'm searching for something more but dealing with the stupidity of others on a daily basis is killing me. So speak what you feel...keep searching.....
|
|
|
Post by Wes Gear on Feb 1, 2011 19:36:05 GMT 10
Thank you sammy. ;D
|
|
|
Post by concrete on Feb 1, 2011 19:48:15 GMT 10
OK kids. The key is in the shadow Since the sun is not a point source of light. All shadows created have an umbra and penumbra. The smaller the object, the smaller the umbra and penumbra. The shadow of the object is too crisp for it to be high up. Think of a jets shadow. Although when one passes over it can get darker. But it will never be a sharp black shape of the jet. More like an oval or circle. So, in my onion. What ever is in the video is ether quite low. Or as someone said on the utube site. The person filmed his monitor while showing the footage, then moved something across the screen and the camera. I don't disagree that it may be a satellite, but I've yet to see a triagular satellite. Also, with all the satellites circling earth. Where are their shadows on a clear sunny day? My biggest guess as to what it is. A good fake. Now kiss and make up you two!!
|
|
|
Post by Wes Gear on Feb 1, 2011 21:01:11 GMT 10
Crete you're wrong on all accounts. But I'm done. I simply do not care anymore.
|
|
|
Post by concrete on Feb 1, 2011 21:18:40 GMT 10
Crete you're wrong on all accounts. But I'm done. I simply do not care anymore. Sparky. Please do explain. I'm man enough to admit when I'm wrong. Prove me wrong. Throwing a tantrum is my job. Personaly. I'm not adverse to it being a satellite. My own eyes and brain tell me it probably is. But, Ive never seen a triangular satellite. If you look at all the current and past lunar orbital missions. Not one has been triangular, well at least to my knowledge. I don't know how. But, I still reckon the image has been doctored. If it has. Then, its a fake.
|
|
|
Post by Wes Gear on Feb 2, 2011 21:01:37 GMT 10
when viewed from above and through a telescope which will flatten the image you would see a triangle. the moon is lit almost entirely different than any other object in the solar system. shadows behave differently. this is all too common knowledge. the moon has no atmosphere and low gravity which means orbiting satellites are closer to the surface and at certain times cast shadows. 5th grade science. the monitor theory you put forth is ridiculous. sounds about right to have came from a youtube comment. now i am truly finished with this.
|
|