|
Post by brillbilly on Feb 5, 2010 1:38:05 GMT 10
GOD stands for Genetic Organized Designer,and nothing to do with the lower titled gods of the bible.lol,just a thought ;D
|
|
|
Post by Wes Gear on Feb 5, 2010 1:45:08 GMT 10
yeah i hear his designer genes are all the rage in paris this year.
|
|
|
Post by brillbilly on Feb 5, 2010 2:26:18 GMT 10
wow GOD is so ambidextrous
|
|
|
Post by Wes Gear on Feb 5, 2010 2:34:20 GMT 10
yep he performs miracles with his left hand while stealing your wallet with his right.
|
|
|
Post by brillbilly on Feb 5, 2010 2:35:34 GMT 10
now that a trick he should teach MPS the world over
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 5, 2010 15:56:28 GMT 10
I think I have seen that porn movie.
But it is as good a theroy as any, and in some ways makes sense.
|
|
|
Post by Wes on Feb 5, 2010 18:03:41 GMT 10
Well I like the idea that I come from a comet better than comimg from an ape, lol.
|
|
|
Post by Wes Gear on Feb 5, 2010 22:31:44 GMT 10
funny thing is wes..........the going theory that is gaining a lot of ground is the its the exact opposite. the great apes and monkeys evolved from us. while we share that infamous high percentage of dna with them they have shown that the apes and monkeys have mutated genes many more times than humans to get where they are now. which means that we are not as closely related to them as previously thought.
based on this apes and monkeys are actually a failed humanoid species. some scientists speculate that it was a faulty gene picked up early on that caused them to evolve too quickly and that it replaced intelligence as the important factor with physical skills. so we are smart and somewhat strong and they are strong and somewhat smart.
of course this theory could be bullshit but its an interesting one at the moment.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 5, 2010 23:11:24 GMT 10
Hey thats really cool, maybe they were us at one time, a previous civilisation, but having destroyed themselves with technology returned to nature and evolved into apes, only to see the process repeat itself again.
|
|
|
Post by brillbilly on Feb 5, 2010 23:21:29 GMT 10
funny thing is wes..........the going theory that is gaining a lot of ground is the its the exact opposite. the great apes and monkeys evolved from us. while we share that infamous high percentage of dna with them they have shown that the apes and monkeys have mutated genes many more times than humans to get where they are now. which means that we are not as closely related to them as previously thought. based on this apes and monkeys are actually a failed humanoid species. some scientists speculate that it was a faulty gene picked up early on that caused them to evolve too quickly and that it replaced intelligence as the important factor with physical skills. so we are smart and somewhat strong and they are strong and somewhat smart. of course this theory could be bullshit but its an interesting one at the moment. ;D i love that idea ;DStudy: Man did not evolve from apes Kent, Ohio (UPI) Oct 1, 2009 A U.S. biological anthropologist says he's determined humans did not evolve from apes, but, rather, apes evolved from humans. Kent State University Professor C. Owen Lovejoy, who specializes in the study of human origins, said his findings came from a study of Ardipithecus ramidus, a hominid species that lived 4.4 million years ago in what now is Ethiopia. "People often think we evolved from apes, but no, apes in many ways evolved from us," Lovejoy said. "It has been a popular idea to think humans are modified chimpanzees. From studying Ardipithecus ramidus, or 'Ardi' (a partial female skeleton) we learn that we cannot understand or model human evolution from chimps and gorillas." Ardi is "not a chimp," paleoanthropologist Tim White of the University of California-Berkeley, told the San Jose Mercury News. "It shows us what we used to be. It bridges a gap." Until Ardi was discovered, the earliest specimen of human evolutions was Australopithecus, a bipedal "ape man" that lived 1-4 million years ago, the newspaper said, noting the most famous member of the genus was the 3.2 million-year-old skeleton nicknamed "Lucy" that was found in 1974. Ardi, White said, is older and more primitive than Lucy, belonging to a new type of early hominid that was neither chimpanzee nor fully human. Lovejoy, White and other scientists present their research in a special Oct. 2 issue of the journal Science. www.terradaily.com/reports/Study_Man_did_not_evolve_from_apes_999.html
|
|