|
Post by Aardvaaks on Sept 14, 2009 21:42:00 GMT 10
A profound and fundamental scientific breakthrough ... regarding how objects really gravitationally orbit one another! And that, as a result, almost 300 years of Newton's long-accepted "Law of Universal Gravitation" was, somehow, wrong ... as might be his equally unquestioned "Three Laws of Motion" ... and potentially (shudder ...), even Einstein's "General Theory of Relativity" .... By Richard C. Hoagland © 2008 The Enterprise Mission www.enterprisemission.com/Von_Braun.htm
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2009 22:25:50 GMT 10
Cool post, I have always had a problem with einsteins theories, not the theories themselves, I am not nearly that smart. But I have problems with these "hard and Fast" rules that expound the idea that everything is known and certain things are impossible.
The science of physics has only been around a couple of hundred years, but we believe we know all the rules of time and motion. That to me is as egotistical as someone in the middle ages proving the world was flat by walking on it.
|
|
|
Post by Aardvaaks on Sept 15, 2009 0:07:44 GMT 10
Thats a good point Darrylm, I think this occurance had all those Nasa scientists scratching their heads to explain where the additional distance had come from, so effectively challenging Newtonian as well as the Einstein theories. This to me indicates that what theory of science applying on the Earth doesnt necessarily apply off the planet.
|
|
|
Post by saffire on Sept 15, 2009 11:18:51 GMT 10
I read this extensively on dtv...........It really hurt my brain.......BUT...........the whole 33.3 degree thing..................why would they keep it secret for all these years? (did I just say that?)
Seriously..........there is merit here...........but I think there are even newer and more important breakthroughs happening right now so I am going to slide this right on by. Naturally if you/we/them hold a finding that blows the conceded beliefs out of the water one would want to keep that upper hand, yet what happened to the renegades that actually care?
The military shouldn't get to keep all the good shit for their own fulfillment and "edge" Humanity is a family of beings............those who need to divide and conquer and steal are greedy bastards and they just don't deserve to own the world...........
Sheez...........
|
|
|
Post by Aardvaaks on Sept 15, 2009 18:16:06 GMT 10
Its a bit like Moore's law in the computing world where the procession of technology in time, increasing at an exponential rate of progress so in this case transisitors on a processor chip, doubling every 2 years, which is expected to peak by 2015. What happens then? As far as science and technology is concerned the rate of progress and discovery is truly astounding now compared to say 50 years ago! Reverse engineered technology anyone, who knows?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 15, 2009 19:12:31 GMT 10
Its a bit like Moore's law in the computing world where the procession of technology in time, increasing at an exponential rate of progress so in this case transisitors on a processor chip, doubling every 2 years, which is expected to peak by 2015. What happens then? As far as science and technology is concerned the rate of progress and discovery is truly astounding now compared to say 50 years ago! Reverse engineered technology anyone, who knows? I was going to mention Roswell in reply to Lucids comments but here will do. I think its been kept hidden because any idea that upsets accepted wisdom always is.
|
|
|
Post by saffire on Sept 16, 2009 3:35:02 GMT 10
I suppose there is great fear of those in power of losing control of the masses.
Problem is that they limit themselves because there are so many great minds who aren't in the hierarchy that could enhance discovery.
It reminds me of the movie Contact when the PTB screwed everything up while a back up of renegades had things ........well.........backed up!
|
|
|
Post by sawltydawg on Sept 28, 2009 11:02:54 GMT 10
wow..it took me like two and a half hours to read part one and two...some very interesting theories regarding torsion fields and their effect on both mechanical and chemical properties. unfortunately i shiver when the term 'free energy' starts to be spoken. it seems to me that the unexpected inertial gain experienced during the explorer and ranger missions is caused not from a positive energy transfer caused by the induction of a torsion field; but by the storing of potential energy during the rotational initiation stages that the early rockets utilized to compensate for solid fuel energy output differential. Depalma's experiments were intriguing to say the least, and i agree that torsion fields can have some effect on matter...but free energy...i doubt it..... an increase in the conservation of energy does not indicate an increase in actual energy.
|
|
|
Post by Aardvaaks on Sept 28, 2009 18:47:55 GMT 10
Theres a theory that Energy isnt available as free at all, there is an offset balance in another area to where the free energy is derived, so the usual applies you cant keep on taking all the time, you got to give also! Or is that nothing in life is free?
|
|
|
Post by sawltydawg on Sept 30, 2009 13:53:30 GMT 10
the only free energy is when you find a battery on the ground
|
|