|
Post by brillbilly on Jun 19, 2018 2:57:06 GMT 10
Ancient High-Technology ~ How Old Are We?..Warangal/Varangal Fort!...Mind blowing tech! How much older does human civilisation actually reach back in time? And just how advanced have past civilisations become? One clue to answer this question, lays within the ruins themselves. Astonishing feats of engineering, that not only indicate a high level of intelligence, but also technological prowess. Extraordinarily refined works, which can still be found in the less inhospitable environments of earth. One of these lesser shared sites is undoubtedly Varangal. Located within the south Indian state of Telangana, It was predictably once snapped, up by our less capable ancestors, possibly claimed as their own, subsequently becoming their capital. Home of the Kakatiya dynasty from the 12th to 14th centuries, this inhabitation, we feel, has then been used regardless of the advanced ruins in question, to age the stone carvings which can be found at the site. Stone monuments carved with such accuracy, skill, and precision, that they evade any logical explanation, as to how they could have been completed, with any of the technologies we know were available to the Kakatiyans, specifically within the 12th century. The site clearly demonstrates tremendous skill, and also technological prowess. These stone monuments, were clearly not only created to express an artistic message, , but they were undoubtedly created to display the creators capabilities, encapsulated in time, quite possibly for the exact purpose of people like us to recognise them, as they may have with similar ruins, that were possibly in existence during their own lifetimes… There is a greatly more interesting, and extensively larger story to tell, regarding the history of our planet, however, as long as those in power feel “inadequate” simply saying, “we don’t know,” ignorance and lies will continue to plague our species.
|
|
|
Post by Wes Gear on Jun 20, 2018 22:39:39 GMT 10
Even if we considered that Giants could have been involved in building these structures we still see evidence of advanced Technology.
|
|
|
Post by brillbilly on Jun 21, 2018 4:14:36 GMT 10
Even if we considered that Giants could have been involved in building these structures we still see evidence of advanced Technology. We could even rule out Giants and we're still left with such techological enigma's..Stunning stone work!
|
|
|
Post by Wes Gear on Jun 23, 2018 23:09:05 GMT 10
Decoding Ancient Engineering Technology at Ramappa Temple, India
Let's take a look at Ramappa Temple which was built at least 800 years ago, and by the end of this video, I think you would agree with me that ancient builders must have used a very advanced technology, similar to modern day technology.
Let's take a look at the ceiling in the center of this temple. In one square, we can see hundreds of Gods and if you zoom in and shine a flashlight, we can identify each and every one of them. Every corner tells a story. We are not going to examine the complex spiral designs which look like 3d cymatic patterns, we are not going to look at the protruding buds, and the centerpiece which is hanging out in the middle. We are only going to zoom in on the smaller figures which are less than 1 inch long. This temple was invaded by a commander called Malik Kafur, and he destroyed some of these figures.
But what's fascinating is that after he destroyed the figures, you can clearly see the X mark behind them. This means there is a gap between each small idol, and the surface at the back. The idols are very small, less than 1 inch long, so the gaps between the idol and the background must have been in millimeters. So, how did anyone create these X marks behind them within these small gaps? Forget about ancient machining technology. We cannot even carve these X marks today, because there is no room to put your hands inside and carve them? How can we make the X pattern on solid rock, with 2 millimeters space to carve, even with modern machinery? We would need flexible drilling and polishing tools similar to instruments used for advanced surgical operations like laparoscopy. Even if they were molded using rock melting technology, the ancient builders would still need very advanced precision tools to create the mold or the frame itself.
But there is more baffling evidence of ancient machining technology. This temple has a series of statues placed all around it, and at first look, you think they are modern day wax models molded to perfection. Archeologists confirm that these were made by ancient builders, but there are no tool marks, and no human errors made on these structures. Were they created using high tech engraving and polishing tools, similar to what we use today? Now, what really baffles me about these statues is not how perfect they are, but how they are still standing in place, even after a powerful earthquake shook this temple. The earthquake dislodged many of the blocks in the temple, and I have already shown you how the ancient builders made this structure earthquake proof. But how did these statues, not fall down?
|
|
|
Post by the57ironman on Jun 24, 2018 1:05:00 GMT 10
very interesting... but i'm not buying the part about that being a tool for drilling...where did they use that, if it were a drill... why would they build a smaller prototype to show their construction techniques..? . ..still...a very interesting vid
|
|
|
Post by brillbilly on Jan 10, 2019 4:20:58 GMT 10
Ancient Warangal Fort - A Mass Manufacturing Megalithic Factory? When you hear the name Warangal Fort, you expect to see a fort or fortifications or crude walls, but here you will find some of the most beautiful carvings, this was definitely not built as a fort. . A fort does not need such beautiful, artistic carvings and complex geometric shapes. Historians also agree that this site is not a fort, but they merely call this a fort, because it is surrounded by fortifications many miles away, but they have no idea what the actual purpose of this place was. Why do we have so many rocks piled up? And in these piles, we can also find some of the most exotic Hindu Gods lying in the dirt. These statues are priceless and are actually worth millions of dollars. In India, you can see they are just left lying around in dirt. Because we find several idols like this, some have argued that this site was built as a temple, and it was later ruined. Was this site, once an ancient temple? and was it ruined by nature or humans? If you examine the site carefully, you can find something weird. There are at least a dozen different types of rocks. This is Red Stone, this is black basalt, and this is granite. This is bizarre, because if a temple was built with a combination of all these rocks, it will look ugly. All Hindu temples are usually built with the same type of rock, it would be impossible to use so many types of rocks for constructing a single temple. And the entrances to this confirm that this was not a temple. The entire site is surrounded by 4 entrances which are just incredibly huge, they are each 33 feet tall. There are no walls surrounding it either, this is very unique, a temple does not need such tall entrances and Hindu temples always have an outer wall around them. If this was not a temple and this was not a fort, what was going on here? What was the actual purpose of this site? No one has come up with a solid answer to this question, but after analyzing this place carefully, I can say this entire place was built as a manufacturing site, as a factory for mass manufacturing, megalithic stone objects. Now, what I am saying goes against all the theories of archeologists and historians. They believe that every ancient temple was built by local artisans and stone masons, who cut stone blocks and carved statues on site, within the temple premises. But Warangal Fort shows something extraordinary, it shows that the pillars, statues, and even blocks for walls were built at a completely different location, a mass manufacturing site. This was the purpose of this site.
|
|
|
Post by the57ironman on Jan 15, 2019 3:13:54 GMT 10
the material (rocks) just ''had to be'' soft in order to cut with such intricacy ... ...that's my thought ...
|
|