|
Post by brillbilly on May 1, 2015 3:58:39 GMT 10
AS17-134-20437-20443 top composite & AS17-147-22494-22521 lower composite . This policy of doubling-up on sets only becomes apparent when a number of individual images are combined to make a panorama, as above. Viewed singly, the elements of these montages look totally convincing. The large mountain is undoubtedly the same in each case, as well as features 'B', 'D' and 'E'. The small crater in the left foreground is also common to both images. One might conclude that the LM, as seen in the top image, was physically uplifted and moved into the foreground prior to photographing the lower image, or the whole thing was put together in the NASA photo lab. Viewed on their own these shots are convincing, and do the trick. But tricks they are, because: 1) the LM cannot change position, 2) the LM cannot change size in relation to the mountain backdrops if the viewpoint is the same, and if the focal length of the lens (60mm Biogon) and the camera used (Hasselblad 500 Lunar Surface Camera) are the same in each case.
|
|
|
Post by Wes Gear on May 1, 2015 4:15:14 GMT 10
Looks like the Rover tracks pass right through where the LEM should be in the top Photo. The foreground in both photos is a little different but the Background is the same.
|
|
|
Post by brillbilly on May 1, 2015 6:49:39 GMT 10
The vanishing LM Not only do the mountains etc move around but the LM itself comes and goes as well. Below are three images by way of examples: namely AS17-134-20448, 134-20416 and 134-20513. AS17-134-20448 top, 20416 and 20513 Although the top two images have adjusted lighting on the mountain backdrop, and the 'valley floor' surface detail is dressed differently, it is recognizable as the same location. What specific evidence is there that these pictures have the same backdrop? As we have pointed out elsewhere the perspective of the background is the same in each case, and two features in particular are clearly visible, those marked ‘A’ and ‘B’. The LM in the top image, taken with the rover (LRV) antenna in foreground, results in a larger LM relative to the backdrop than in the lower picture, as the LRV is nearer to the LM. However, in the middle picture, there is no sign of the LM at all. "But surely none of these physical differences could have occurred in reality on the Moon – even if they were actually there?" you may ask. No, of course not. So what really happened in the taking of these photographs? No one will ever know for sure. But it is clear, as we have stated before, that the same locations and the same backdrops enjoyed multiple re-use. These locations were also the settings used as an arena for the astronauts in the recorded TV coverage. Flag with no shadow
|
|
|
Post by Rareclan on May 1, 2015 13:42:27 GMT 10
How could the LEM move,NASA please Explain?
No, sorry we can't.....
just except it,
we never went and we spent all your money........
ttfn
|
|
|
Post by brillbilly on May 4, 2015 9:30:25 GMT 10
Looks like the Rover tracks pass right through where the LEM should be in the top Photo. The foreground in both photos is a little different but the Background is the same. yeah wes,check out the other pictures i've added to the post,too many anomalies if ya ask me!
|
|
|
Post by Wes Gear on May 4, 2015 23:12:11 GMT 10
The top photo is said to be a composite of two photos, AS17-134-20437 and AS17-134-20443, but see both below. AS17-134-20437AS17-134-20443The botom photo is said to be a composite of AS17-147-22494 and AS17-147-22521. AS17-147-22494AS17-147-22521Seems photo AS17-147-22517 has been used. The composite photos are not a true panorama/
|
|
|
Post by brillbilly on May 5, 2015 0:33:10 GMT 10
Now ya see it...now ya dont lol....Someones telling porkies!
|
|