|
Post by Aardvaaks on Oct 31, 2009 8:02:50 GMT 10
Wasnt it Pythagoras who saw triangles everywhere and postulated and wrote about them. Now Im talking about the flying kind, not necessarily the Stealth planes used by the USAF but possibly something used by another occupant or probably occupants as these vehicles or whatever are described in many cases as blotting out half of the sky whilst silently moving overhead. This case link below interested me as it was witnessed by credible witnesses or mainly police officers over 2 consecutive nights and this gigaantic object floated down my way and I missed the whole thing. www.ufocasebook.com/1993cosfordshawbury.htmlwww.qtm.net/~geibdan/newsb/nick.htmlPS DBoysy, I got around to this posting eventually mate, cheers for your help in finding the dates.
|
|
|
Post by dboyseeker on Oct 31, 2009 8:19:09 GMT 10
A very interesting case Aards, I really dont buy the rocket re-entry theory. It seems that Nick pope was on a little documentary about this case on German TV (Galileo Mystery). They reckon it was some kind of secret military project, or a hyper-speed plane (project Aurora) pope was a guest in it and admitted that it's more probable that it was a secret plane than a spaceship ful of aliens. I however am just not sure. www.nickpope.net/cosford_incident.htm
|
|
|
Post by Aardvaaks on Oct 31, 2009 8:38:03 GMT 10
Yes concerning the Stealth angle, but I dont understand why Usaf would fly over our military bases especially quite intentionally unless it was piloted by an Eastern nation. These two incidents alerted the authorities, an innocuous fly pass would be more suitable surely?
|
|
|
Post by dboyseeker on Oct 31, 2009 9:33:11 GMT 10
whatever it was it certainly grabbed the attention of a lot of trained observers eh. I think its too easy to blame a secret hyperspeed craft. Also why were the mod checking to see on their radars, surely because of base security they would have known in advance ?
|
|
|
Post by Aardvaaks on Nov 1, 2009 7:50:05 GMT 10
whatever it was it certainly grabbed the attention of a lot of trained observers eh. I think its too easy to blame a secret hyperspeed craft. Also why were the mod checking to see on their radars, surely because of base security they would have known in advance ? I agree they all talk to each other, especially if they are supposed to be on the same side!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 1, 2009 11:53:55 GMT 10
whatever it was it certainly grabbed the attention of a lot of trained observers eh. I think its too easy to blame a secret hyperspeed craft. Also why were the mod checking to see on their radars, surely because of base security they would have known in advance ? I dont think thats entirely true, I believe they like to keep bases and other countries in the dark about test flights of secret stealth aircraft, just to test how stealthy they really are. With Aroura, it proberbly wouldnt matter anyway, it would go over so fast they wouldnt have time to pick it on radar, they are suggesting 16 000 miles an hour.
|
|
|
Post by dboyseeker on Nov 2, 2009 0:09:10 GMT 10
whatever it was it certainly grabbed the attention of a lot of trained observers eh. I think its too easy to blame a secret hyperspeed craft. Also why were the mod checking to see on their radars, surely because of base security they would have known in advance ? I dont think thats entirely true, I believe they like to keep bases and other countries in the dark about test flights of secret stealth aircraft, just to test how stealthy they really are. With Aroura, it proberbly wouldnt matter anyway, it would go over so fast they wouldnt have time to pick it on radar, they are suggesting 16 000 miles an hour. yea fair point, but as you said it wouldnt matter anyway. It was hardly stealthy with so many witnesses. I think its an interesting unexplained case. UFO.
|
|
|
Post by brillbilly on Nov 2, 2009 5:14:20 GMT 10
nick pope is not a fave of mine,because over the years he has swopped and changed his views like the weather,in the early 1990s he was all about aliens being real,but as time gone on he has started to conform to the medias orders,now they wheel him out as the best person to give talks on ufos,lol.try timothy good or nick redfern,thay have the juicy bits lol
|
|
|
Post by Aardvaaks on Nov 2, 2009 5:19:24 GMT 10
Good point Brills, Nick Pope was very much skeptic, then not, however last year he appeared on the ''Ufo hunters history channel talking about the Rendlesham Forest incident he was a bit spooked by that account.
|
|
|
Post by brillbilly on Nov 2, 2009 5:47:19 GMT 10
for me hes just the mainstream spokesman,this was his view when he started outhe is very carfull with words now
|
|