Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 1, 2009 14:08:01 GMT 10
Man, how do you so presicely fit those huge stones togeather. If they were cut at the site you would have to sand it, place it, check the fit, then remove it, sand some more check the fit again. The process could be endless.
|
|
|
Post by Hesop on Sept 1, 2009 16:42:32 GMT 10
I'ld like to see someone duplicate these walls today, using same sized stones and rudimentary hand tools. Especially the ones that are always persistent in mocking superior race theories. In every one of the MANY (failed) attempts to prove how the pyramid was built, they always leave out, how they placed the huge ass stones in the grand galley.
|
|
|
Post by saffire on Sept 2, 2009 3:44:40 GMT 10
What a sense of accomplishment after achieving something like that.
I have never actually seen stones of so many angles and cuts all laid out like that. Very impressive, and to imagine them using the hand tool! Just Wow. I wish I had been alive at that time, or maybe not, hopefully it wasn't a group of slaves doing all the labor.........
|
|
|
Post by blacky on Sept 2, 2009 4:03:44 GMT 10
Thats just it though lucid! it doesnt look like these were cut with simple hand tools!!! No ones sure how they did it!
|
|
|
Post by saffire on Sept 2, 2009 8:16:05 GMT 10
Puts whole new meaning to the talents of the "builders" does it not?
|
|
|
Post by seahawk100 on Sept 8, 2009 19:04:18 GMT 10
The precision with which these fit together is incredible by modern day standards. The question that I find interesting, is that if they could cut these stones with such precision, why did they not just cut perfectly square, or rectilinear stones, for easier, consistent and regular fitting. Were the odd shapes of each stone used as part of the intended "design?" Were they trying to prevent waste of material- trying to use every inch of each stone possible?
The technological ability, in skill, doesn't seem to exactly match the level of design ability. I can't quite put my finger on it, but something about the two things seems incongruous. Does that bass-akward statement make sense to anyone? Maybe you guys can say what I mean better than I seem to be able to at the moment.
|
|
|
Post by brillbilly on Sept 9, 2009 4:31:09 GMT 10
hi seahawk, its puzzled me why they didnt cut them square but get this they are cut in such a way that they withstand earthquakes,beacause they have such weird angles when an earthquake hits they just wobble about and settle again,so it looks like they had a purpose in their design
|
|
|
Post by Aardvaaks on Sept 18, 2009 20:35:44 GMT 10
Its interesting the link here between technical building ability, secret societies and in particular the Masons, maybe they have become down thru the ages elite due to previous knowledge base which could have been lost totally/incompletely through time?
|
|
|
Post by brillbilly on Sept 18, 2009 22:54:00 GMT 10
Its interesting the link here between technical building ability, secret societies and in particular the Masons, maybe they have become down thru the ages elite due to previous knowledge base which could have been lost totally/incompletely through time? i so agree about the masonic order having knowledge that they hold secret.Look at any ground plan for washington/london/paris and you will see that citys are laid out with sacred geomatry.i have followed and reserched freemasonry,not just the norm masons up to the 3rd degree but up to the 33rd degree and thats were the real secrets can be found
|
|