Proof that Machu Picchu was not built by the Incas

[brillbilly]

[Deleted]

Its a good theory, definatly looks like two different construction techniques.

[brillbilly]

to me its the wrong way round
the more crude stone carving should be earlyer than the exquisit almost molded bottom layers?

[Crickinneck]

Brill Brillbill How they got that Helecopter to fly through the doorway and buildings beats me lol
good post though bill...Crick

[shatnerswig]

the guy in the video is right 2 different techniques ... i wonder if the original structure was destroyed by nature or war.....?

[Wes]

Nov 5, 2010 7:31:42 GMT 10 brillbilly said:

to me its the wrong way round
the more crude stone carving should be earlyer than the exquisit almost molded bottom layers?

The crude stone may have been a rebuild by survivors after some event that killed most of the stone cutters.

[Deleted]

Homer destroyed the Stonecutters Wes.



Sorry, it just sprang to mind.

[Wes]

Yeah forgot that. That bloody birthmark. ;D

[shatnerswig]

Nov 5, 2010 18:31:55 GMT 10 @darrylmckay said:

Homer destroyed the Stonecutters Wes.



Sorry, it just sprang to mind.

yea and you just killed brills thread thank you mr . cokey!

[Wes]

The Inca, like Romans of the Old World, were inheritors of several thousand years of human cultural development, traditions and technological evolution. The Inca were masters of using and improving upon what they had learned from earlier peoples. They are best known for amazing feats of engineering, management, road building and astonishing architectural achievements like Machu Picchu, accomplished with only stone, wood and bronze tools.

www.adventurespecialists.org/machupicchu.html

But as you point out Brill their technology seems to have gone backwards at some stage. Or is what we see on the top of the walls (reconstruction) actually their only work.