A study performed by National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) and published in Science Express in April 2008 concluded that a proposed geoengineering strategy to cool the planet by injecting sulfates into the atmosphere:
“likely would destroy between about one-fourth to three-fourths of the ozone layer above the Arctic…The sulfates would also delay the expected recovery of the ozone hole over the Antarctic by about 30 to 70 years.” [4]
A report published in March 2010 by the House of Commons Science and Technology, titled The Regulation of Geoengineering, concluded that geoengineering would likely affect rainfall quality and distribution as well as produce droughts:
“Schemes that inject particles into the atmosphere are likely to alter the distribution of rainfall and also cause some reduction in the global quantity of rainfall.” [5]
“Solar Radiation Management (SRM) could produce droughts with severe implications for regional and global food production, and delay the recovery of the ozone layer by decades.” [6]
Scientists and scholars who met in the UK in early 2011 to debate the use of geoengineering to cool the atmosphere came to a similar conclusion regarding undesired consequences of such actions:
“Cloud experimentation or localized solar ‘dimming’ could – intentionally or unintentionally – cause droughts or floods in neighboring areas, arousing suspicions and international disputes.” [7]
The ETC Group report titled Geopiracy: The Case Against Geoengineering provides a good summary of the risks associated with geoengineering and strongly recommends a moratorium on geoengineering:
“The geoengineering suite of technologies affects outer space, the atmosphere, the land, the oceans and fresh water bodies, the weather, the production of food, the protection of health and livelihoods, and national sovereignty. It entails risks that we know about and many more that we cannot yet predict. Until there has been a full debate on the course all countries wish to go, there must be a moratorium on all geoengineering activities outside the laboratory. Anything else is folly, putting the planet and its peoples at tremendous and unjustifiable risk.” [8]
Geoengineering endangers the environment and the ability to sustain life on Planet Earth. It could destroy the entire natural ecosystem worldwide because the forest, the flora, the fauna, the air, and the water do not recognize borders between nations. If our entire ecosystem is damaged or ruined, then, at a minimum, the quality of life on the planet will be greatly diminished.
Geoengineering is Happening Now and is Being Covered Up
Geoengineering has been secretly implemented worldwide as documented in the Case Orange report by the Belfort Group:
“Manipulation of climate through modification of Cirrus clouds is neither a hoax nor a conspiracy theory, but currently the best-option in geo-engineering by decision makers to counter global warming… The technology to organize spraying operations on a global scale is widely available. Both civil and military aviation is used for that purpose.” [13]
For more about existing geoengineering programs and their impact on the environment and your health, see sections 1-4 of the document Human Rights Approach on Trans-National Hazardous Environmental Programs.
To make matters worse, the public is being deliberately deceived about geoengineering. M. Granger Morgan, the head of the Department of Engineering and Public Policy at Carnegie Mellon University, made the following statement at a Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) meeting on “Developing an International Framework for Geoengineering” [14]:
“First of all, of course, there is a lot of money getting spent to make sure that a very substantial portion of the public stays totally confused about this. And, I mean, it’s been really quite pernicious. But there’s been literally tens of millions of dollars spent on every little thing that comes along that might, you know, relate to some uncertainty.”
aircrap.org/geoengineering-violates-human-healthy-environment-heres-about/332280/