|
Post by shaggietrip on May 2, 2017 9:59:50 GMT 10
Ancient Artifacts. Interesting. It seems by archeologists today that the ancient can only be dated so far back.
That sentence you have just read may be either a forced item or a conundrum. I respect the science but the scientist them self's seem to have alternative motive. so much hidden knowledge. I do thank you for the thread and awareness.
skol
|
|
|
Post by ratrodrob on May 3, 2017 11:05:34 GMT 10
Ancient Artifacts. Interesting. It seems by archeologists today that the ancient can only be dated so far back. That sentence you have just read may be either a forced item or a conundrum. I respect the science but the scientist them self's seem to have alternative motive. so much hidden knowledge. I do thank you for the thread and awareness. skolIt doesn't matter to me if im lookin at pyramids, stone henge, elongated skulls, Nazca lines, ancient ruins, lost tech etc etc etc, it all fills my mind with wonder and awe, but it stops right there, cause the literature and "scientific" comment I read behind all these marvellous mysteries is taken with a grain of salt.
The scientific community largely is agenda/academically driven IMO, and people like Zahi HawASS (when he were Egypt's head of antiquities ) deliberately withheld, controlled any historical information regarding the pyramids and sphinx that did not conforn to their agenderistic views..........(agenderistic ..?.. I think I just invented a new word haha)
This can be true for any scientific communities working on any ancient mysteries, but even if there is no fudging of evidence related to historical finds and artifacts, how can I be sure (as simply a reader/observer) that all their testing like carbon dating etc etc is correct/accurate...?
So I sit here knowing that my eyes see marvellous things of old, and I wonder and marvel at these mysteries of antiquity and beyond, and it will always be that way for me as in my mind I cannot fully trust any scientist or scientific conclusion relating to these mysteries.
There are some researchers that I have admired and trusted, like Lloyd Pye for example, (unlike Eric Vondaniken lol) But Pye never had the backing or financial support of mainstream scientific communities, (I wonder why lol) so it is always going to be an enormous struggle for the likes of Pye to fully conclude any mysterious artifacts/anomalies, and even if Pye or others are successful in completing and proving their hypothesis, what mainstream scientific community would support them and present their finds..??
Like Shaggy said, its a good thread.............................................................RRR
|
|
|
Post by brillbilly on May 8, 2017 10:04:22 GMT 10
Ancient Artifacts. Interesting. It seems by archeologists today that the ancient can only be dated so far back. That sentence you have just read may be either a forced item or a conundrum. I respect the science but the scientist them self's seem to have alternative motive. so much hidden knowledge. I do thank you for the thread and awareness. skolIt doesn't matter to me if im lookin at pyramids, stone henge, elongated skulls, Nazca lines, ancient ruins, lost tech etc etc etc, it all fills my mind with wonder and awe, but it stops right there, cause the literature and "scientific" comment I read behind all these marvellous mysteries is taken with a grain of salt.
The scientific community largely is agenda/academically driven IMO, and people like Zahi HawASS (when he were Egypt's head of antiquities ) deliberately withheld, controlled any historical information regarding the pyramids and sphinx that did not conforn to their agenderistic views..........(agenderistic ..?.. I think I just invented a new word haha)
This can be true for any scientific communities working on any ancient mysteries, but even if there is no fudging of evidence related to historical finds and artifacts, how can I be sure (as simply a reader/observer) that all their testing like carbon dating etc etc is correct/accurate...?
So I sit here knowing that my eyes see marvellous things of old, and I wonder and marvel at these mysteries of antiquity and beyond, and it will always be that way for me as in my mind I cannot fully trust any scientist or scientific conclusion relating to these mysteries.
There are some researchers that I have admired and trusted, like Lloyd Pye for example, (unlike Eric Vondaniken lol) But Pye never had the backing or financial support of mainstream scientific communities, (I wonder why lol) so it is always going to be an enormous struggle for the likes of Pye to fully conclude any mysterious artifacts/anomalies, and even if Pye or others are successful in completing and proving their hypothesis, what mainstream scientific community would support them and present their finds..??
Like Shaggy said, its a good thread.............................................................RRR
Quote : The scientific community largely is agenda/academically driven IMO, and people like Zahi HawASS (when he were Egypt's head of antiquities ) deliberately withheld, controlled any historical information regarding the pyramids and sphinx that did not conforn to their agenderistic views..........(agenderistic ..?.. I think I just invented a new word haha) I have to agree!.. i feel this way too about the scientific community and whoreass.What Science knows today it re-writes tomorrow,so what we get taught today becomes bollox when it comes to what they say about dating and artifacts.!
|
|