|
Post by brillbilly on May 16, 2024 21:05:42 GMT 10
|
|
|
Post by brillbilly on May 16, 2024 9:53:23 GMT 10
King Charles ‘blood-soaked’ portrait goes viral
Not only does it look satanic, notice the monarch butterfly
|
|
|
Post by brillbilly on May 16, 2024 1:38:35 GMT 10
Neil Oliver: Lockdown Letters! From lockdowns to the next scamdemic and on to CBDC:s....We here have always connected them to ongoing Agenda's heres more on the Scottish COVID-19 Inquiry that neil showed part of! Scottish COVID-19 Inquiry www.covid19inquiry.scotDirect link to all inquiry hearings www.covid19inquiry.scot/hearingsLink to Dave, independent researcher / biologyphenom Day 15 of the inquiry Direct link to this witness statement www.covid19inquiry.scot/sites... 54. The care home thought that they should give her a mild sedative to stop her getting up and down so much and help her sleep through the night and keep the cannula in. My mum agreed to that but if she had known what the sedative was she would have said no as she was a retired nurse and, they (care home) should not have asked her anyway as she was not authorised to approve this. 55. At this point my grandmother was eating and drinking by herself, moving to the toilet herself, that there was only mild symptoms and that they were giving her the nasal oxygen just as a precaution as her stats were a little low but, with the cannula in, she was fine. Her stats had actually improved 65 I was provided with a document at a meeting I had with one of the solicitors. The document was the DNR but this had my name written on it. I was shocked as this was the first time I had seen this document and did not even know it existed. Also from day 15 Direct link to this witness statement www.covid19inquiry.scot/sites... Day 21 of the inquiry Day 30 of the inquiry Direct link to transcript for day 30 www.covid19inquiry.scot/sites...
|
|
|
Post by brillbilly on May 15, 2024 0:01:11 GMT 10
Man Lifts 25-Ton Block By Hand?
The point to be made is man can even pull huge tonne objects with his hair like this, but did the ancients move their megaliths just with brute strength?
Understanding balance points and moving huge objects to prove points misses one huge fact,that they all do it on beautiful leveled flat prepped ground...lets see them demonstrate it on edges of volcanoes like Easter island or lets see them move one of the balbek megaliths to the temple site from the quarry?. This to me has always been the enigma,just because you may be able to float a 10tonne obelisk on sheep's bladders give enough dont mean thats how it was done,same as showing people moving huge weights only proves we can move huge weights in controlled level environments...Remember this vid below how to prove how they did it? lol...yeah just keep scaling it down lol,then get cranes to move the final one it to position,cut n splice the footage and bingo thats how they did it lol.
But hold on a mo?...did they not use water and not sand n gravity? lol
My point is even with todays technology proving 100% this was how it was done has not come to light!...ie..Walking upright small megaliths by wobbling from side to side on flat prepd ground dont prove thats how some were walked down accross n up parts of volcanic ground?
|
|
|
Post by brillbilly on May 14, 2024 22:57:00 GMT 10
The NEXRAD Doppler Radar HOAX - PART 2
This vid is 3 hour's long,but sometimes thats how long it takes to offer evidence.
|
|
|
Post by brillbilly on May 14, 2024 22:53:02 GMT 10
but could they turn in to vampires like Christopher Lee?
|
|
|
Post by brillbilly on May 14, 2024 21:43:35 GMT 10
Rendlesham Forest UFO sighting: Eyewitness Colonel Charles Halt...Ross Coulthart
The full story of the Rendlesham Forest UFO sighting, where two airmen encounter a strange object on a cold December night in 1980. Journalist Ross Coulthart unravels the chilling events that unfolded in Suffolk, England, involving a nuclear base and eyewitness Colonel Charles Halt. Ross Coulthart, in one of his first UFO/UAP investigations for 7NEWS Australia, looked into sightings from the UK. This interview was filmed in 2009. It is with Colonel Charles Halt, who witnessed the Rendlesham Forest UFO UAP incident.
KEY MOMENTS IN THIS VIDEO | CHAPTERS 0:00 Ross Coulthart’s 2024 introduction 2:53 Interview with Rendlesham UFO sighting witness, Colonel Charles Halt 62:08 The plaster casts 64:02 The tape recorder
Nothing to see here..it was just a lighthouse ...cough!...yeah right?
Shocking Revelations in Rendlesham Forest UFO Event - UK's Roswell
Join retired US Air Force fighter pilot and UFO investigator Chris Lehto as he interviews Gary Hesseltine, a retired British police detective and author of the new book "Non-Human: The Rendlesham Forest UFO Incidents - 42 Years of Denial."
In this fascinating discussion, Gary provides an in-depth look at the Rendlesham Forest UFO incidents that took place over several nights in late December 1980 near two US Air Force bases in Suffolk, England. With Chris's aviation expertise, the two analyze witness accounts and examine new evidence uncovered during Gary's extensive 5-year reinvestigation of these historic events.
Gary explains why Rendlesham may be the most complicated UFO case ever, with multiple sightings, hundreds of military eyewitnesses, and layers of secrecy and denial by both US and UK governments. The case features reports of landed triangular craft, interactions between UFOs and military personnel, and a craft releasing glowing orbs with non-human entities inside (Larry Warren).
Chris and Gary explore the context of nuclear weapons secretly stored at the bases, the international political climate in 1980, and why these factors may have attracted the UFOs' attention. They also discuss the potential for additional evidence to still exist, including audio recordings, film footage, and lost documents.
For anyone fascinated by military UFO encounters or seeking a deeper understanding of Rendlesham's mysteries, don't miss this Lehto Files interview with UFO researcher and author Gary Hesseltine.
|
|
|
Post by brillbilly on May 14, 2024 8:00:09 GMT 10
Pre-Historic Mega Structures of Japan & Unexcavated Giant Tombs
From massive granite blocks and quarries carved with extraordinary accuracy to immense stone walls, Japan’s landscape tells a story of an advanced prehistoric society. This documentary delves deep into the heart of Japan’s forgotten megaliths.
Awesome Mind blowing stonework!
|
|
|
Post by brillbilly on May 14, 2024 7:58:15 GMT 10
I still wont trust it!
|
|
|
Post by brillbilly on May 8, 2024 5:55:28 GMT 10
"People Were CENSORED And Shut Down!" - Covid Vaccine Pandemic Payouts Soar
Now more people can see truths coming to light!....it was only a matter of time!
Some even have the balls to tell you what was in these vaccines! Covert Genetically Modified Organisms
An Australian Federal Court case has evidence to say they are GMOs
Case File Number: VID510/2023
Dr Julian Fidge v. Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd & Moderna Pty Ltd
Dr Fidge is an Australian medical doctor and trained pharmacist.
The case has been brought under the Australian Gene Technology Act 2000
Section 10 of Gene Technology Act defines what a Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) is.
First, an Organism is:
‘any biological entity’
‘capable of transferring genetic material’
The Pfizer and Moderna Covid products contain LNP-modRNA complexes
These complexes satisfy being called ‘any biological entity’ under the law
The modRNA is genetic material
The Lipid Nanoparticles or LNPs encapsulate the modRNA and together bio-distribute and transfer the LNP-modRNA complexes throughout the human body
The LNPs then transfect and transfer the modRNA cargo across cell membranes to deliver the modRNA inside cells
By moving the modRNA about the body and then into cells, the LNP-modRNA complexes physically transfer genetic material after injection
So the Organism part of the GMO definition is satisfied by the physical mode of transport of the LNP-modRNA complexes
The next part of the GMO legal definition is – a Genetically Modified Organism is:
an organism that has been modified by gene technology
The Gene Technology part requires showing:
any technique for the modification of genes or other genetic material.
Pfizer and Moderna admit they modify genes to create modified RNA or modRNA for their products
The MHRA, EMA, FDA, and TGA when approving the Covid-19 products recognised Pfizer and Moderna use modified nucleosides for the modRNA
In the TGA Australian approval for Pfizer for example, the TGA notes:
The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, BNT162b2 mRNA (tradename Comirnaty), comprises a nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (modRNA) encoding the viral spike glycoprotein (S) of SARS-CoV-2.
Pfizer and Moderna create their modified nucleosides in the lab using recombinant techniques
So the Gene Technology part of the GMO legal definition is also satisfied
This means the Pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 products satisfy the Australian legal definitions for being properly called GMOs
Under the Australian Gene Technology Act anyone who ‘deals’ with a GMO in Australia must be regulated under a GMO licence
Pfizer and Moderna failed to apply for GMO licences in Australia
Dealing with GMOs in Australia without a GMO licence is a serious criminal offense under Section 32 of the Gene Technology Act 2000
In fact the boss of Australia’s Office of the Gene Technology Regulator, or OGTR, recently admitted to an Australian Senate Committee that both the Pfizer and Moderna products are GMOs
No Australian was told by the OGTR or the TGA that they were being asked to receive Genetically Modified Organisms or GMOs when getting a Covid-19 injection
This is not just an Australian GMO legal issue
In the United Kingdom Genetically Modified Organisms are dealt with under the Environmental Protection Act 1990 and specifically Section 106 under Part VI
The United Kingdom legal definitions for what is regarded as a GMO is almost identical to the Australian legal definitions we just looked at
Like in Australia, the United Kingdom requires new GMOs to be subjected to an extensive Risk Assessment
Even after an extensive Risk Assessment the United Kingdom Secretary of State still has to provide a Consent before a GMO can be introduced into the United Kingdom
The MHRA knew United Kingdom GMO legal definitions applied to Pfizer and Moderna because it is their job to know and they have GMO experts
But both Pfizer and Moderna applied for marketing approvals under the Human Medicines Regulations 2012 which exempted them from having to undergo a GMO Risk Assessment for their Covid-19 products
And because of that exemption neither company had to mention on the Product Information that their products contain GMOs even though they satisfy the legal definitions
|
|