|
Post by Aardvaaks on May 4, 2010 20:08:06 GMT 10
On September 14th 1957 in Ubatuba UFO crash, Brazil, an object crashed after dipping at high speed close to the water. Fragments were collected which landed onshore but mysteriously disappeared (here we go) when in the lab, however some testing was achieved showing pure magnesium. Was this debris from an exploding probe or saucer? or could it have been exhausted material from a secret government nuclear powered craft? www.ufologie.net/htm/ubatuba57.htmwww.karenlyster.com/ufoland.htmlOK so maybe not a nuclear powered government craft, as Quote 'Rockets using nuclear and solar fuel sources were also tested for space missions. Nuclear propulsion was first developed in the 1960s and was considered 20 years later for missions to Mars, but concerns about space debris kept this system in the experimental stages. Solar propulsion appeared promising for its ability to run an engine at tremendous cost savings'. www.answers.com/topic/guided-mis ... unit-parts
|
|
|
Post by brillbilly on May 4, 2010 20:37:39 GMT 10
:oThe geology lab determined that the magnesium was of a very high purity with a reading of 1.87 as opposed to a normal reading of 1.74.
APRO sent a sample to the USAF, but the sample they sent met with an 'accident' while the USAF were testing it. The USAF asked for a further sample to be sent. APRO declined.
The remaining samples where used with varying results, until the samples became too small to of been any use in tests.
APRO still have one small remaining sample in their vaults.
;D how convenient
|
|
|
Post by Aardvaaks on May 4, 2010 20:52:47 GMT 10
Another case of things going missing, initial witness and metal samples and inconclusive test results, but it makes you think, this scenario makes the incident more solid overall.
|
|
|
Post by brillbilly on May 4, 2010 20:57:09 GMT 10
it just narcs me that time and time again pieces of a so called ufo goes missing and i never think its just an accident!
|
|
|
Post by Aardvaaks on May 5, 2010 8:04:59 GMT 10
it just narcs me that time and time again pieces of a so called ufo goes missing and i never think its just an accident! That's your suspicious mind working overtime ;D however we know this goes on all too often in fact certain agencies have it down to a fine art. The old saying fool me once, shame on you, twice, shame on me, well this proves the point time after time! We ain't no fools.
|
|
|
Post by shatnerswig on May 5, 2010 8:50:28 GMT 10
;D
|
|
|
Post by shatnerswig on May 5, 2010 8:57:48 GMT 10
yea this ooops we lost the sample blah blah blah ... its bullshit i deal with sampling everyday .. theres a chain of custody that goes along with samples .. its part of sampling protocol... it starts with the person who collected the samples ... everyone who has handled the samples must sign name date and time before they hand it off to the next ... and to be quite honest .. i ve probably handled 10 's of thousands of samples and although they were not pieces of a ufo ... not 1 of those 10 s of thousands ever got lost! some entity is manipulating this sample loss of that i have no doubt!
|
|
|
Post by Aardvaaks on May 5, 2010 21:31:19 GMT 10
yea this ooops we lost the sample blah blah blah ... its bullshit i deal with sampling everyday .. theres a chain of custody that goes along with samples .. its part of sampling protocol... it starts with the person who collected the samples ... everyone who has handled the samples must sign name date and time before they hand it off to the next ... and to be quite honest .. i ve probably handled 10 's of thousands of samples and although they were not pieces of a ufo ... not 1 of those 10 s of thousands ever got lost! some entity is manipulating this sample loss of that i have no doubt! So effectively what you are saying Wiggy is this, if you research in Ufo samples, your efficiency hit rate tails off drastically...Spooky that!
|
|
|
Post by shatnerswig on May 6, 2010 4:23:17 GMT 10
whoever handled the sample last on the chain is responable for its whereabouts .... if it makes it to the lab with the chain of custody intact and is then lost ... the lab tech is responsable for physical location of the sample.... aside from someone sneaking in and stealing the samples ... its pretty hard for a sample to just ... poof !... disappear from a lab..... its not like the night cleaning lady would come in and accidentally throw it away or something.
|
|
|
Post by Aardvaaks on May 7, 2010 20:17:33 GMT 10
The inference was that one of the labs samples which was quite small from the beginning had been used up, now bearing in mind that the sample required would be quite small it makes me think that maybe it was shared around for its scientific importance.
|
|