|
Post by concrete on Mar 24, 2010 4:16:24 GMT 10
That scottish kid. Lill feck! He is the only reason I can't fully discredit past lives. I just find them hard to believe.
|
|
|
Post by theshee on Mar 24, 2010 4:18:52 GMT 10
So did I concrete thats why I had to hunt out what had come up with mine.
|
|
|
Post by shatnerswig on Mar 24, 2010 5:49:04 GMT 10
just finished vids nice find shee very interesting stuff ...that boy ....... he was there before ....of that i have no doubt ....i wonder if there is such a thing as a parallel world or worlds to our earth ,that if we might reicarnate from one world to the next ... almost the same world... just an idea that popped into my head. lol
|
|
|
Post by Wes on Mar 24, 2010 7:36:17 GMT 10
....i wonder if there is such a thing as a parallel world or worlds to our earth ,that if we might reicarnate from one world to the next ... almost the same world... just an idea that popped into my head. lol Now your getting the idea Shatner. And because of different time lines in these other parallel worlds we can be living in more than one place at the same time because time is curved as space is curved. When some contactees say they have met some one from Venus it doesn't have to be the Venus that we know. It could be a Venus running on a parallel time line or existing in a different dimension (frequency).
|
|
|
Post by Wes Gear on Mar 24, 2010 11:36:10 GMT 10
not a big fan of the whole 'frequency' thing. too much love and light implications from just one word.
but i am a fan of parallel universes. as much as i hate to admit it referring to other universes as being on different frequencies is a great analogy.
still despise the "humans are on the cusp of a higher frequency"..........so on judgment day and/or the day we evolve that higher frequency i'll be one of the assholes still standing on earth waving goodbye to the rest and thinking about all the shit i'm gonna steal from your homes.
|
|
|
Post by shatnerswig on Mar 24, 2010 11:45:02 GMT 10
kinda like that old tv show sliders
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 24, 2010 12:43:20 GMT 10
I have long believed that our dreams are us keeping in touch with our other parralel selves.
Those strange dreams where you are still you, but everything else is different.
|
|
|
Post by theshee on Mar 24, 2010 20:26:42 GMT 10
I have long believed that our dreams are us keeping in touch with our other parralel selves. Those strange dreams where you are still you, but everything else is different. If that’s the case I lead a very freaky weird life somewhere else Interesting thought though.
|
|
|
Post by Wes on Mar 24, 2010 20:49:17 GMT 10
Shee, ever heard of Bi-location: The appearance of an individual in two places simultaneously. What exactly occurs in the phenomenon of bilocation is uncertain. The prevailing theory suggests that it is a projection of a double. In appearance to others the double may appear to be a solid physical form, or may be ghostly. Usually this double acts strangely and mechanically and does not acknowledge others when spoken to. Although it is uncommon, bilocation is an ancient phenomenon. It is claimed to have been experienced, and even practiced by will, by mystics, ecstatics, saints, monks, holy persons, and magical adepts. Several Christian saints and monks were adapt at bilocation such as St. Anthony of Padua, St. Ambrose of Milan, St. Severus of Ravenna, and Padre Pio of Italy. In 1774, St. Alphonsus Maria de’Ligouri was seen at the bedside of the dying Pope Clement XIV, when in fact the saint was confined to his cell in a location that was a four-day journey away. A pioneer psychical researcher, Frederic W. H. Myers, one of the founders of the Society for Psychical Research in England, along with others collected and studied reports of bilocation, however the phenomenon has received little interest in modern times. Spontaneous and involuntary bilocation sometimes presages or heralds the death of the individual seen. www.themystica.com/mystica/articles/b/bilocation.html
|
|
|
Post by Wes on Mar 24, 2010 20:58:00 GMT 10
In the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, it is defined as: Main Entry: bi·lo·ca·tion Pronunciation: 'bI-lO-"kA-sh&n Function: noun Date: 1858 : the state of being or ability to be in two places at the same time In PSI TECH's TRV Generation II Dictionary, it is defined as: Bilocation: The required mind state for accurate remote viewing to occur. The remote viewer's attention span is split in half so that half of the viewer's conscious attention is at the target matrix site and the other half is with the viewer tending to TRV structure. Explanation:In TRV (Technical Remote Viewing) terms it is quite literally being in two places at once. After the TRV protocols are initiated, the viewer's attention splits. One half of the viewer's conscious and unconscious attention is at the target matrix site (or the target blueprint in the collective unconscious) and the other half is with the viewer's senses tending to TRV structure. Bilocating in TRV structure induces a heightened sense of awareness referred to as "a state of high attention." This is the optimal mind state to effect the remote viewing process. When bilocating, are we actually "going" anywhere?This question is often asked by RV researchers and RV novices. When we are exploring a target via TRV, we are directing our attention to a specific blueprint (or topic) in the collective mind (or The Matrix.) As we initiate the TRV protocol and become bilocated, we begin to sense the target, smell the target, hear the target and see fleeting images of the target, as well as kinesthetically feel the target. We can actively experience the target while we passively document its data. We do not actually "go" anywhere even though at first it may feel that way. As we learn how to manage our attention, we become accustom to the feeling of bilocating only the required 50%. It is difficult for a non-TRVer to understand this process because it is very much like trying to explain what it feels like to swim or ride a bike. One does not really know about swimming or riding a bike until one has had the experience. It is difficult to explain TRV also because there was not another method like it beforehand, so there is no comparison or template to fall back on. This is why there is the continuous necessity to separate remote viewing away from the rest of the parapsychological and psychic processes. The ideas of TRV were scattered throughout the fields of psychology, philosophy and parapsychology but it wasn't until 1983 that these idea were formulated into a breakthrough method that created a teachable system that any person could learn: Technical Remote Viewing. www.trvnews.com/tsl/032103/index.html
|
|