Those are different issues, entirely.
Who would you like to classify what is and what is not ‘dangerous disinformation’? Those who are best qualified to identify it might be a better choice.
I’m not sure that any government ‘does science’ as such - they do have the power to pick and to choose what guidelines (regarding ‘the science’) they follow but the criteria employed in doing so will rarely put people as the overriding priority. I think I have previously stated the reasons for restrictions and lockdowns.
I am not sure that the term “coerced injections of very questionable substances” would stand up in any court. I have not been coerced - I am not obliged to be vaccinated. I know what is being injected into me if I do choose to be. I was under the impression that you and I live in the same country? I know that the vaccine works to reduce numbers and that is the only reason that a (fearful and corrupted) government made steps towards making vaccination mandatory in some areas.
It’s not my intention to raise applause from you for the bill - but I would like to understand why you think it is so very detrimental. The ‘covid’ aspect of the bill is as I have pointed out (‘deliberately sharing dangerous disinformation about hoax Covid-19 treatments’) and the law cannot go further than that aspect. What is important is to keep an eye on the exact wording of the bill in that respect and I can assure you there are plenty of eyes watching this one!
Everything on this planet is geared up for the few (the rich along with the perverse) and those few are doing anything and everything to hold it in place at this time. I welcome a cyber world where my descendents are able to move about freely and safely. I would go further and completely revamp the educational, health and welfare sectors to align with such sentiments and to instigate a complete overhaul of the economic system across the planet. Oh, a myriad of better ways to be alive...People are made to think that all these things are too difficult - impossible but they are not, everything is just as difficult or as simple as one makes it.
I am not so sure that it is unprovoked censorship that has been increasing every year as it is the need to put some past mindsets in order! I certainly will applaud anything that seeks to put an end to sexism, racism, ageism etc and a great many minds younger than my own are also on that side of the fence. There have been birth-pangs aplenty over recent years - a longing for another way of being - stirred by younger minds and hearts in great part. That is a good thing - wanting to rise above prejudice and bias and I certainly applaud them for wanting to be in a world that puts diversity and equity in such high regard.
I can appreciate how it might look to some people however, the lack of full and unaccountable freedom of speech...but we are all responsible for what we put out into the world - the personal hate speech - the group hate speech - the collective hate speech. Each and every one of us are responsible in part for the whole. Just as this present world is geared up to benefit the few (yet, it IS failing and falling - whether you care to see that or not) so the (Other) few must be brave and take steps towards changing those aspects that have kept humankind in chains for too long now. It's not going to be easy - pushing against the goads as they must - and it is going to stir some confusion and reservations in many, I know. I should say, it IS stirring confusion and reservations...But if humankind is to survive, only the most courageous of Mothers will serve to see it through.