Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 14, 2009 14:59:07 GMT 10
Not a Russian missle then, surprise surprise
|
|
|
Post by Aardvaaks on Dec 14, 2009 19:57:28 GMT 10
This light show originates from the direction of a Haarp station in Norway apparently.
|
|
|
Post by Wes Gear on Dec 15, 2009 0:04:09 GMT 10
yeah i am just having a hard time believing its a missile.
|
|
|
Post by Aardvaaks on Dec 15, 2009 2:04:07 GMT 10
yeah i am just having a hard time believing its a missile. Hey Drex the squiggle far right bottom on pics 1, 8, and magnified on 9 are supposed to indicate where the rocket trajectory started to go wrong, apparently!
|
|
|
Post by Wes Gear on Dec 15, 2009 2:24:11 GMT 10
when i say i'm not buying it being a missile i really mean i'm not buying it as being any conventional missile we are aware of.
if its a scram jet missile which would explain the trajectory and altitude russia would not say so.
concrete's theory on ionization would also be inline with a scram jet configuration. a scram jet would allow for better control of a missile. using drone technology they could keep the missile in low orbit for an extended period of time before deciding on whether to drop it back into the atmosphere on target or bring it home.
a scarm jet has no moving parts. it takes air forced in by flight and mixes it with an oxygenated fuel mist and ignited. the fuel is the key. we use solid fuel which is more stable for rockets and the shuttle but for a scram jet you need a liquid fuel with oxygen...........something that is very hard to make stable enough to use safely. this exotic fuel mix could very well have caused everything we see in the pics.
or it could have been a secret satellite launch that failed and the toxic fuel inside the satellite its self ignited.
i'm leaning towards either the scram jet theory or another type of next generation platform for nuclear weapons.
|
|