Post by brillbilly on Feb 25, 2015 6:00:52 GMT 10
I just signed the petition, "HAMPSTEAD ALLEGED ABUSERS COME TO BE EXAMINED: We demand that the alleged abusers with apparent distinguishing marks come forward to be examined by independent trusted doctors and the police."
I think this is important. Will you sign it too?
Here's the link:
www.change.org/p/hampstead-alleged-abusers-come-to-be-examined-we-demand-that-the-alleged-abusers-with-apparent-distinguishing-marks-come-forward-to-be-examined-by-independent-trusted-doctors-and-the-police
Thanks,
***bb***
UPDATE!
WANTED for Discussion, not Arrest by #BarnetPolice - but how many signatures will it take to get the children back?
Sabine McNeill
London, United Kingdom
24 Feb 2015 — Wonderful Supporters,
It took a third phone call by my remarkable criminal solicitor who had offered his help after he'd seen my video - this time to a colleague of the officer in charge in Barnet Police - to establish that I'm only wanted for discussion. I don’t know how many officers had been to my flat for ‘discussion’. But they spoke sufficiently to my landlord and neighbour that she did not want to talk to me any more and take my side!
I don't know whether the same kind of ‘wantedness’ applies to the mother, too. After all, she was visited by 10 police officers before she left the country. A barrister who happened to have been with her told them off, as they didn't have an arrest warrant. Well, Colindale Police station who phoned me on Friday 13th February don't have one either!
Does that mean I am safe to travel back and WON'T be taken off the plane or train to be put into a Police cell for having published something that I never did publish?
Meanwhile, this remarkable video has been produced by a couple who left the country after the police wanted them for investigating the case of a daughter who had been abducted from her father in Belgium against all EU laws. vid.me/Mxmk is labelled CCPS as it highlights Christ Church Primary School as the centre of connections between cult members who have most recently been published by Veterans Today: www.veteranstoday.com/2015/02/22/anonymous-leaks-satanic-cult-member-names-places-phone-s/
So I am now wondering: how do we measure criminality? Let me count the ways:
1. The 'Strategy meeting' of a 'multi-agency conglomerate' on 9 September that decided to take the kids into 'care', i.e. SEPARATE them from their mother to whom they had at long last confided about the abuse and threats of being killed by their father. See whistleblowerkids.wordpress.com/about/ According to the Police reports which I have, that meeting clearly wanted to frame the mother's partner Abraham Christie and question the mother's mental health.
2. The 'honey trap' built by Barnet Police to interview the kids again on 11 September and take them into 'Police Protection'.
3. LB Camden who applied for an 'Emergency Protection Order' so that foster parents could be paid at least £400 per week per child to look after them without sending them to school for 3 months.
4. Barnet Police who closed the case on 22 September with "Crime not confirmed."
5. LB Barnet who agreed to become the 'designated authority' and the Court with judge Vera Mayer who made her first Order on 24 September which included WEEKLY contact for the father and FORTNIGHTLY contact for the mother.
6. The father who was 'automatically' part of the proceedings thus ensuring income for his solicitors and barristers.
7. Social Services of Camden and / or Barnet who ensured that after 6 days in 'care' the children retracted their allegations and got them interviewed again by Barnet Police.
8. LB Barnet's Senior Solicitor Suzannah Hargreaves who hounded the mother through the secret family court demanding one document after another.
9. Two solicitors and a barrister whom the mother sacked before working with us as voluntary McKenzie Friends: mckenzie-friends.co.uk/ since they clearly did NOT act in her or the children’s interest.
10. Three more orders by judge Vera Mayer including NOT letting the children come home for Christmas and transferring the case to High Court judge Dame Anna Pauffley.
11. The Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police whose Legal Services responded to the Judicial Review that we filed on 22 December - just in time 3 months after the case had been closed. They
-- contacted Barnet Council claiming we had used 'confidential' information, presumably the Police videos
-- contacted Haringey Council because the retired constable who had produced Witness Statements about the Police reports and the Police interviews had mentioned the name of a sibling of the famous Baby P case which had given rise to snatching more and more children away from their parents.
12. Both mounted extra hearings to keep the legal machinery going and suggested the destruction of the evidence provided by the list of interested parties which includes MEPs whom I know from by petition in Brussels to Abolish Adoptions without Parental Consent: www.change.org/p/eu-parliament-abolish-adoptions-without-parental-consent
13. In her first additional hearing. Dame Anna Pauffley asked McKenzie Friend Belinda McKenzie to give an undertaking on behalf of our Association to keep the proceedings confidential. Belinda thought she could expect a fair trial. I have yet to publish her Open Letter to the judge about this 'corporate gagging': belindammckenzie.wordpress.com/
14. She also asked the mother to hand in the Police videos "for her protection."
15. Since then, she refused to address the mother's issues because she was supposedly too much under my influence. She came to that conclusion because of the Position Statement that we had put before her: whistleblowerkids.wordpress.com/about/position-statement/
The mother's issues are:
-- Section 31 of the Children's Act as the reason for holding the children: the risk of serious harm - despite the mother having had a 'Residence Order' in place and two 'Non-Molestation Orders' against the father before her children made the allegations against him;
-- the inequality of contact (WEEKLY for father, after twice a month before and FORTNIGHTLY for mother) plus a laptop that the father had given to the children for Skype conversations;
-- a request for a Non-Molestation Order for life; we had been to the Family Court in High Holborn where the judge sent us back to the High Court;
-- the Judicial Review for the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police to re-open the case. Dame Pauffley had said that she had the power to deal with this application.
The most worrying aspect is that we have not heard from the mother or her partner since last Friday...
Please watch the video and share, share, share. It was produced by a couple I know who had also fled the country because the Police didn't like them investigating the case of an abduction of a girl.
Once we have polling facilities, I shall ask whether you think I can go back to my flat and publish more of the evidence... See whistleblowerkids.wordpress.com/this-case/evidence/
Yours between sighs and hopes,
Sabine.
I cant just sit back and do nothing regarding getting the Truth out in public...I do have a voice even if some would wish i remain silent.!
I think this is important. Will you sign it too?
Here's the link:
www.change.org/p/hampstead-alleged-abusers-come-to-be-examined-we-demand-that-the-alleged-abusers-with-apparent-distinguishing-marks-come-forward-to-be-examined-by-independent-trusted-doctors-and-the-police
Thanks,
***bb***
UPDATE!
WANTED for Discussion, not Arrest by #BarnetPolice - but how many signatures will it take to get the children back?
Sabine McNeill
London, United Kingdom
24 Feb 2015 — Wonderful Supporters,
It took a third phone call by my remarkable criminal solicitor who had offered his help after he'd seen my video - this time to a colleague of the officer in charge in Barnet Police - to establish that I'm only wanted for discussion. I don’t know how many officers had been to my flat for ‘discussion’. But they spoke sufficiently to my landlord and neighbour that she did not want to talk to me any more and take my side!
I don't know whether the same kind of ‘wantedness’ applies to the mother, too. After all, she was visited by 10 police officers before she left the country. A barrister who happened to have been with her told them off, as they didn't have an arrest warrant. Well, Colindale Police station who phoned me on Friday 13th February don't have one either!
Does that mean I am safe to travel back and WON'T be taken off the plane or train to be put into a Police cell for having published something that I never did publish?
Meanwhile, this remarkable video has been produced by a couple who left the country after the police wanted them for investigating the case of a daughter who had been abducted from her father in Belgium against all EU laws. vid.me/Mxmk is labelled CCPS as it highlights Christ Church Primary School as the centre of connections between cult members who have most recently been published by Veterans Today: www.veteranstoday.com/2015/02/22/anonymous-leaks-satanic-cult-member-names-places-phone-s/
So I am now wondering: how do we measure criminality? Let me count the ways:
1. The 'Strategy meeting' of a 'multi-agency conglomerate' on 9 September that decided to take the kids into 'care', i.e. SEPARATE them from their mother to whom they had at long last confided about the abuse and threats of being killed by their father. See whistleblowerkids.wordpress.com/about/ According to the Police reports which I have, that meeting clearly wanted to frame the mother's partner Abraham Christie and question the mother's mental health.
2. The 'honey trap' built by Barnet Police to interview the kids again on 11 September and take them into 'Police Protection'.
3. LB Camden who applied for an 'Emergency Protection Order' so that foster parents could be paid at least £400 per week per child to look after them without sending them to school for 3 months.
4. Barnet Police who closed the case on 22 September with "Crime not confirmed."
5. LB Barnet who agreed to become the 'designated authority' and the Court with judge Vera Mayer who made her first Order on 24 September which included WEEKLY contact for the father and FORTNIGHTLY contact for the mother.
6. The father who was 'automatically' part of the proceedings thus ensuring income for his solicitors and barristers.
7. Social Services of Camden and / or Barnet who ensured that after 6 days in 'care' the children retracted their allegations and got them interviewed again by Barnet Police.
8. LB Barnet's Senior Solicitor Suzannah Hargreaves who hounded the mother through the secret family court demanding one document after another.
9. Two solicitors and a barrister whom the mother sacked before working with us as voluntary McKenzie Friends: mckenzie-friends.co.uk/ since they clearly did NOT act in her or the children’s interest.
10. Three more orders by judge Vera Mayer including NOT letting the children come home for Christmas and transferring the case to High Court judge Dame Anna Pauffley.
11. The Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police whose Legal Services responded to the Judicial Review that we filed on 22 December - just in time 3 months after the case had been closed. They
-- contacted Barnet Council claiming we had used 'confidential' information, presumably the Police videos
-- contacted Haringey Council because the retired constable who had produced Witness Statements about the Police reports and the Police interviews had mentioned the name of a sibling of the famous Baby P case which had given rise to snatching more and more children away from their parents.
12. Both mounted extra hearings to keep the legal machinery going and suggested the destruction of the evidence provided by the list of interested parties which includes MEPs whom I know from by petition in Brussels to Abolish Adoptions without Parental Consent: www.change.org/p/eu-parliament-abolish-adoptions-without-parental-consent
13. In her first additional hearing. Dame Anna Pauffley asked McKenzie Friend Belinda McKenzie to give an undertaking on behalf of our Association to keep the proceedings confidential. Belinda thought she could expect a fair trial. I have yet to publish her Open Letter to the judge about this 'corporate gagging': belindammckenzie.wordpress.com/
14. She also asked the mother to hand in the Police videos "for her protection."
15. Since then, she refused to address the mother's issues because she was supposedly too much under my influence. She came to that conclusion because of the Position Statement that we had put before her: whistleblowerkids.wordpress.com/about/position-statement/
The mother's issues are:
-- Section 31 of the Children's Act as the reason for holding the children: the risk of serious harm - despite the mother having had a 'Residence Order' in place and two 'Non-Molestation Orders' against the father before her children made the allegations against him;
-- the inequality of contact (WEEKLY for father, after twice a month before and FORTNIGHTLY for mother) plus a laptop that the father had given to the children for Skype conversations;
-- a request for a Non-Molestation Order for life; we had been to the Family Court in High Holborn where the judge sent us back to the High Court;
-- the Judicial Review for the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police to re-open the case. Dame Pauffley had said that she had the power to deal with this application.
The most worrying aspect is that we have not heard from the mother or her partner since last Friday...
Please watch the video and share, share, share. It was produced by a couple I know who had also fled the country because the Police didn't like them investigating the case of an abduction of a girl.
Once we have polling facilities, I shall ask whether you think I can go back to my flat and publish more of the evidence... See whistleblowerkids.wordpress.com/this-case/evidence/
Yours between sighs and hopes,
Sabine.
I cant just sit back and do nothing regarding getting the Truth out in public...I do have a voice even if some would wish i remain silent.!