|
Post by brillbilly on Sept 18, 2014 21:35:27 GMT 10
www.hiddenincatours.comJump to 6min mark for the Megalithic Stone Works. Thought to have been exclusively created by the Inca about 500 years ago, there is compelling evidence that Machu Pic'chu was in fact found by the Inca, or at least the core of the city was. The Inca did not have the capability to do the highly precise work in the granite stone of the center of the city, and built their buildings around it. The core is evidence of Lost Ancient High Technology. Also Is There A City Under Cusco Peru? Cusco Peru is of course well known as the capital of the Inca, from 1100 to 1533 AD. However, new excavations of a major Inca road has shown that an even more ancient city may lay below the Inca capital.
|
|
|
Post by Wes Gear on Sept 19, 2014 0:39:30 GMT 10
Cheers Brill. It seems so obvious that there are two, or more, different levels of skill used at Machu Picchu. While watching the videos, while contemplating the differences in this skill level, a thought crossed my mind. Dressed stones and, rough, undressed stones. One is by the hand of a "Master' stone Mason. And the other is not.
|
|
|
Post by brillbilly on Sept 19, 2014 4:40:43 GMT 10
Cheers Brill. It seems so obvious that there are two, or more, different levels of skill used at Machu Picchu. While watching the videos, while contemplating the differences in this skill level, a thought crossed my mind. Dressed stones and, rough, undressed stones. One is by the hand of a "Master' stone Mason. And the other is not. Anyone want to take a great closer look.! gigapixelperu.com/Welcome.htmlMachu Picchu captured in highest ever resolution: Zoomable picture of Inca citadel allows viewers to see it in impressive detail The picture is actually a collage of nearly 2,000 individual images taken one-by-one then spliced together on computer Photographer says he hopes it will raise awareness of the dangers posed to the historic site gigapixelperu.com/Welcome.html An amazing photo captures Machu Picchu in what could be the highest resolution image ever taken of the Inca citadel. The historic site, high in the Peruvian Andes, can be seen in unprecedented detail in a zoomable image shot in 15.9 gigapixels. The picture was taken by Jeff Cremer, photo tour director of Rainforest Expeditions, a company that runs eco-tourism trips to the Peruvian Amazon. Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2235202/Machu-Picchu-captured-highest-resolution-Zoomable-picture-Inca-citadel-allows-viewers-impressive-detail.html#ixzz2ENSqI8x5 Wow have a look.........friggin awesome! you can zoom it to other structures on the mountains behind...awesome zoom Read more: criticalbelievers.proboards.com/thread/16166/machu-picchu-captured-highest-resolution#ixzz3Dh4lE6Me
|
|
|
Post by brillbilly on Sept 19, 2014 4:44:26 GMT 10
|
|
|
Post by Wes Gear on Sept 19, 2014 15:12:11 GMT 10
Cool link Brill, cheers. I remember looking at this a while back, I remember talking about the odd body parts, like heads and legs, in the photo with no body. It is great to look at this again with new eyes (knowledge). We have learnt that the Rock terracing is to stop landsliding. And I can now see were the rock walls have been filled with mud. Both seem to have been built with different levels of skill, but not has advanced as the 'Temple' rocks.
|
|
|
Post by stone071 on Sept 20, 2014 23:34:00 GMT 10
So few are looking at peru and south america with open minds. No way it could be as old as the pyramids right. yet we now have gobleki tepe to point at and realize we don't know jack. Yet the mainstream still refute that there were cultures and civilizations which were around way before 'giza'. So sad.
|
|
|
Post by Wes Gear on Sept 23, 2014 0:37:31 GMT 10
So few are looking at peru and south america with open minds. No way it could be as old as the pyramids right. yet we now have gobleki tepe to point at and realize we don't know jack. Yet the mainstream still refute that there were cultures and civilizations which were around way before 'giza'. So sad. Well I see it like this Stone. The Pyramids, which are above ground, are not as old as those that have been buried by time. The further we dig down the further back History will go.
|
|
|
Post by stone071 on Sept 23, 2014 2:56:05 GMT 10
Unfortunately Wes part of that history is under water near our coastlines. Good luck getting mainstream to look there. Cause you know, that would be to far back in history to have civilisations. They were just Hunter gathers. History is linear, no chance of people advancing at different rates. The whole world went from stone age men to civilized humans all at the same time. Kinda like now, we all have high speed internet, electric, clean water, clean food, A/C, unlimited healthcare, etc. RIGHT?
|
|