|
Post by Wes Gear on Sept 11, 2013 20:06:02 GMT 10
Why We Did, In Fact, Land on the Moon: A Photography-Based ProofOne of the most vehemently argued conspiracy theories of all time is that, in 1969, NASA did not actually land on the moon. Many different breakdowns of the photo and video footage have been used to make this point (think: flag waving, missing stars, etc), leading most conspiracy theorists to argue that the great Stanley Kubrick actually filmed the moon landing in a television studio. Writer/Director S.G. Collins, however, disagrees — and he’s got the photographic/videographic reasoning to prove it. Fair warning, Mr. Collins does drop the occasional curse word throughout the video and the humor may be a bit dry for some people’s tastes, but he does offer fairly conclusive evidence to back up his point: while the technology to land on the moon did exist in ’69, the technology to fake it did not. link
|
|
|
Post by Rareclan on Sept 12, 2013 2:18:59 GMT 10
A Photography-Based Proof, that didn't get radiation exposure,,unlike the astronauts whom died because we did not have the technology to cure them......... drip-feeding your audience to 'buy' something probably started as long ago as the dawning of money. Roswell space suits must have protected the film and crew ! Did we back engineer Apollo 11 from advanced knowledge so that it was believable and to put on a good show to further an agenda involving every conspiracy theory to the present date, they've lied ! Lead Balloons
|
|
|
Post by brillbilly on Sept 12, 2013 3:25:49 GMT 10
No No NO LOL,We did NOT got to the Moon!
We the many had to watch a TV screen to get a view of what could be the Moon?!
We the many can only see what a Man on the (Moon/fake Moon) looks like from NASA, who released photos n film of the Public kind!
Sorry to say,but i find NASA an Enigma!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 12, 2013 12:41:42 GMT 10
I dont question the Moon landings.
What I question is why we stopped going.
|
|
|
Post by electrobadgr on Sept 12, 2013 21:23:04 GMT 10
This video prompted a great back and forth between Collins and Jarrah White, here is whites rebuttal (sorry i can't embed, on my phone)
|
|
|
Post by electrobadgr on Sept 12, 2013 21:28:26 GMT 10
|
|
|
Post by electrobadgr on Sept 12, 2013 21:29:15 GMT 10
|
|
|
Post by Wes Gear on Sept 12, 2013 22:59:23 GMT 10
This video prompted a great back and forth between Collins and Jarrah White, here is whites rebuttal (sorry i can't embed, on my phone) Thanks Electrobadgr, this video gives a lot of evidence that prove that a lot of Collins' arguments are invalid. But one thing about time. I have thought about this for a few years now. Does the curve of space influence 'local' time? Once you leave the influence of the curve in space caused by the Mass of the Earth and enter the curve in space caused by the Mass of the Moon, does time change? The frame rate of footage shot on the Moon and what we see on TV, transmitted from the Moon live. ? the film shot on the moon and brought back seems, to me, to move at different speeds to what we see on the recordings of the NASA televised footage. Does time move differently on the Moon or is there an easy way to explain this?
|
|
|
Post by shatnerswig on Sept 13, 2013 6:38:22 GMT 10
yea I think the russians would have blown nasa off the TV if the moon landings were faked ... they would have known by tracking our rockets and told every media entity they could, I don t think they would miss an opportunity to make the USA look like a bunch of lying stooges to the rest of the world
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 13, 2013 9:44:53 GMT 10
Plus, I could consider the arguement we didnt go if they only did it once. But by going 16 times, thereby having to fake 16 missions kinda makes it a lot more difficult to fake and get away with.
|
|