|
Post by timetravel02 on Sept 3, 2012 12:40:46 GMT 10
When the unit is stable light will no longer escape the field and will travel with you. The unit in question was located the other side of the wall. Attachments:
|
|
|
Post by timetravel02 on Sept 3, 2012 12:43:50 GMT 10
There is no light being beamed at this point the light is entirely trapped, and follows the contours of the frequency of field. Attachments:
|
|
|
Post by timetravel02 on Sept 3, 2012 12:46:56 GMT 10
The light will move both in and out of matter, but appears to slow down after the initial merge. The wall the light is moving through is from my time. Attachments:
|
|
|
Post by boxfree on Sept 3, 2012 13:01:05 GMT 10
|
|
|
Post by timetravel02 on Sept 3, 2012 13:03:49 GMT 10
I am not science minded, and I have never used a unit.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 3, 2012 14:53:38 GMT 10
I am not 14. I was born on the 25th of October 1998. Here I am 14, in my line I am no longer that age. Ok wait ur born in 1998 and ur from 2042 and there ur 56 years? Pls explain such math.
|
|
|
Post by Wes Gear on Sept 3, 2012 14:57:51 GMT 10
The light will move both in and out of matter, ... By this do you mean the light moves between wave and particle states? And can I also ask you Timetravel, do you know if the light is effected by space curvature? I can understand how the light will be unaffected while in the 'wave' state but I could see this as a problem if the light phased into a 'particle' state say while near the gravitational influence of a Black Hole. Would this create navigational problems or would the trick be to make sure that the light remained in the 'wave' state.
|
|
|
Post by timetravel02 on Sept 3, 2012 15:20:46 GMT 10
The passage you quote explains your question. If you understand what I meant. I am born in 1998 here. I am not from here. In my line I am 56. Here I am 56. What can you conclude from this ? I am surprised nobody has brought this up yet as it was clearly anomalous to start with.
If I existed on your line and continued to the time on my line from my present. I would be 44 by the age of birth from this line. Yet I am 56.
Think about that.
|
|
|
Post by timetravel02 on Sept 3, 2012 15:34:54 GMT 10
The light will move both in and out of matter, ... By this do you mean the light moves between wave and particle states? And can I also ask you Timetravel, do you know if the light is effected by space curvature? I can understand how the light will be unaffected while in the 'wave' state but I could see this as a problem if the light phased into a 'particle' state say while near the gravitational influence of a Black Hole. Would this create navigational problems or would the trick be to make sure that the light remained in the 'wave' state. The light makes passage through both everything and nothing at the same time. When the unit is disabled the light caught in the field moves with the observer, but not if an observer is not present. Or so I was told. The curvature of space and time does affect light yes. The light capture is a by product on the influence of the hardware, which was allegedly discovered in very early tests. You have had huge technological leaps in the last 7 years, far more so than we had at our time, this puts this line in stead to be far ahead of us by the time you get the time we, or should I say I perceive as my constant. The unit harnesses duel head spin singularities. Light reacts differently to different lines, an infinite amount of which are variable and an infinite amount of which are not. There have been horror stories relayed to me regarding early use of such mechanisms.
|
|
|
Post by Wes Gear on Sept 3, 2012 17:39:07 GMT 10
The light makes passage through both everything and nothing at the same time. .... Light reacts differently to different lines, an infinite amount of which are variable and an infinite amount of which are not. By this do you mean the polarity of the light moves between positive to negative, matter to antimatter? By saying that light reacts differently to different lines, do you mean that the frequency of light is different?
|
|