|
Post by realorfake on Sept 2, 2009 14:20:42 GMT 10
Ok read all that, I am not convinced that the moon is hollow, but its a good arguement. The point for me is why dosnt the moon rotate like almost everything else in the solar system. I think spinning has to do with collisions. When planets initially form they dont spin - i think. So the ones that do spin (earth) most likely have moons that are most likely the remnants of the collision. The moons were matter left over from the collision and coalesced afterwards and therefore do NOT have a spin... The larger body that survived he collision most likely got a nice kick and hence its spin... If there were total destruction of both objects then I believe any body(s) formed thereafter would have no spin...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2009 15:00:17 GMT 10
Ok read all that, I am not convinced that the moon is hollow, but its a good arguement. The point for me is why dosnt the moon rotate like almost everything else in the solar system. I think spinning has to do with collisions. When planets initially form they dont spin - i think. So the ones that do spin (earth) most likely have moons that are most likely the remnants of the collision. The moons were matter left over from the collision and coalesced afterwards and therefore do NOT have a spin... The larger body that survived he collision most likely got a nice kick and hence its spin... If there were total destruction of both objects then I believe any body(s) formed thereafter would have no spin... I would have thought that when the earth spins, the effects of its spinning gravity feild would make the moon spin too. Like two wheels in a cog acting on each each other. I really dont know much about this, but it just seems strange to me.
|
|
|
Post by blacky on Sept 2, 2009 20:04:19 GMT 10
I think spinning has to do with collisions. When planets initially form they dont spin - i think. So the ones that do spin (earth) most likely have moons that are most likely the remnants of the collision. The moons were matter left over from the collision and coalesced afterwards and therefore do NOT have a spin... The larger body that survived he collision most likely got a nice kick and hence its spin... If there were total destruction of both objects then I believe any body(s) formed thereafter would have no spin... I would have thought that when the earth spins, the effects of its spinning gravity feild would make the moon spin too. Like two wheels in a cog acting on each each other. I really dont know much about this, but it just seems strange to me. Thats one of the main problems that I have with the moon! No spin! And the fact that we can have solar eclipses! the moon is just at the right distance to do so??? What are the odds of that. Also the moon being older than the earth! Where did the moon come from? Going to look into realorfakes points later!
|
|
|
Post by realorfake on Sept 2, 2009 23:20:43 GMT 10
Ok, my logic regarding the spinning of the moon was incorrect. The moon does have some spin due to the tidal forces exerted by earth. Read.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2009 23:29:44 GMT 10
My brain hurts.........that was some good information there RoF, certainly answered a lot of my questions, thanks for that.
|
|
|
Post by Wes Gear on Sept 3, 2009 2:39:55 GMT 10
Man I am so glad we started this site. That was some excellent info gentlemen.
I don't believe the moon is hollow through and through. But if a good portion has been mined out on one side it would create the gravitational abnormalities we find. They all seem to get stronger as you move towards the backside of the moon.
Now an interesting new concept is coming out. We've all heard how the moon was created by a mars size planet which sideswiped earth creating the debris that formed the moon. I've never been a big fan of this theory but here is the kicker............what if that mars sized planet was actual;y mars. One whole side of mars is lower than the other side and has less gravity. This has always been put off as some extraordinary impact from a large asteroid. What if it wasn't? What if it was the remains of the impact with earth?
Some new evidence suggests mars was molten for a lot longer than was first thought. Some say molten for so long that life could have never gained a foot hold on the planet. Thats only if you assume it did not have life before it struck the earth.
I have conflicting thoughts on a lot of this. Our moon is just to perfect for a mere accident of nature and it is the largest moon in the solar system yet unlike the other larger moons has no atmosphere or volcanic activity. It should since it influences our tides and we being larger should have kept the core of the moon hot.
So its a very confusing subject with many great theories and many conflicting ones as well.
|
|
|
Post by blacky on Sept 3, 2009 3:03:03 GMT 10
That was good bubble burster..... erm rof lol Still havent found anymore info on the hollow moon theory! had a look for an hour or so but nothing is mentioned yet! I arent buying the book they have brought out! lol If I do manage to come across anything then I will post it and let you know! You might want to put this info on the topic I did on Disclose! Everyone has just gone along with it and not questioned anything about it! My hats off to you sir!!!
|
|
|
Post by brillbilly on Sept 7, 2009 8:16:31 GMT 10
nice homework blacky,i think that the moon could be hollow but im more inclined to think that it has huge hollow caverns that could hold all sorts of things,we will probly never know as nasa pulls the stings on what they know and what they want us to know.
|
|
|
Post by Aardvaaks on Sept 21, 2009 20:38:50 GMT 10
This thread throws up so much thought provoking stuff, good one! On the subject of hollow planets/satellites I know that after one failed attempt last summer the Inner Earth North Pole expedition is still planned. Would you like to sign up or what?? www.npiee.org/the_expeditionOn this theory they point to the fact that Planets such as Neptune and Saturn appear to have Auroras over their North Poles. Back to Earth, a lot of Myths surround large beings and giants coming from underground of course the Admiral Byrd account but what about the 19th century Olaf Jansen account?
|
|
|
Post by Aardvaaks on Sept 23, 2009 22:16:01 GMT 10
How about these 2 fellows findings? Vasin and Shcherbokov, Two Soviet scientists, have spent much of their careers examining the facts compiled on lunar phenomena. Their conclusion is that the Moon is artificial, possibly a hollowed-out planet, and that it was steered from some distant region of the galaxy into a circular orbit around our planet (hence the extraordinary mystery of rock and Moon-dust age variations). They claim that intellectual life has existed in the Moon for eons. N. Huntley, Ph.D. www.redicecreations.com/specialreports/2006/01jan/moon.html
|
|