|
Post by brillbilly on Jun 27, 2011 3:13:43 GMT 10
Some believe it is about protecting civilians, others say it is about oil, but some are convinced intervention in Libya is all about Gaddafi's plan to introduce the gold dinar, a single African currency made from gold, a true sharing of the wealth. "It's one of these things that you have to plan almost in secret, because as soon as you say you're going to change over from the dollar to something else, you're going to be targeted," says Ministry of Peace founder Dr James Thring. "There were two conferences on this, in 1986 and 2000, organized by Gaddafi. Everybody was interested, most countries in Africa were keen." I cant rule this out as one reason!
|
|
|
Post by Aardvaaks on Jun 27, 2011 9:45:10 GMT 10
That's a good point concerning currency being used as actually worth something quite novel and very backward thinking to olden time. The good old £ was replaced by the $ in the 20th century and we survived although the world is now a very different place and the US is no doubt concerned also with Chinese bond holdings, the dollar being worth zilch and Fort Knox guarding no gold not to mention Chinese settlement/influence in Africa. A troubled area indeed. Rumour also appeared concerning sanctions on Iran due in part to their desire to drop the dollar in trading oil and using the Euro of all things, that would be a major coup, interesting article brills.
|
|
|
Post by Rareclan on Jun 27, 2011 9:56:25 GMT 10
Not the only country, rumour has it ! ! ! (and for quite a while).
|
|
|
Post by mediasorcerer on Jun 27, 2011 13:16:17 GMT 10
now there targeting gaddafi for murder,unbelievable,what the fuk has he done to anyone,? show me proof hes done anything,and what business is it of foreign countries to step in and murder other countries leaders? for no good reason let alone at all, imagine if libya said,we dont like obama, were going to kill him,imagione the indignation? were coming to drone bomb you, usa? why,we dont "like" obama, hes a tyrant.
|
|
|
Post by brillbilly on Jun 28, 2011 1:18:02 GMT 10
now there targeting gaddafi for murder,unbelievable,what the fuk has he done to anyone,? show me proof hes done anything,and what business is it of foreign countries to step in and murder other countries leaders? for no good reason let alone at all, imagine if libya said,we dont like obama, were going to kill him,imagione the indignation? were coming to drone bomb you, usa? why,we dont "like" obama, hes a tyrant. The formate they use to demonise a county and its leaders, is just the same blue print that has been used for decades! but they now have the added advantage of the propaganda machine called the media to help discredit and demonise to help forward the agenda. Only one country will benefit...............ISRAEL!
|
|
|
Post by boxfree on Jun 28, 2011 10:35:05 GMT 10
OK.... Gaddafi ordered the bombing of Pan Am flight 103 over Lockerbie killing 270 innocent people, he's shown that he's willing to kill and rape his own people and deserves no pity.....
|
|
|
Post by brillbilly on Jun 28, 2011 11:03:18 GMT 10
They should have arrested gaddafi at the time of lockerbie me thinks. but no! They just let him carry on regardless, but now they want his country to try this new thing called democracy,lol Once hes out the way im sure they will have the next all lined up!
I dont like him for murder in the middle east, no more than i like my own goverment for murder in the middle east because Wars are just cancers that spread from one country to the next and always naming and shaming as it advances. All i have to go on regarding libya and gaddafi is what the media says,and i never hold what the media says as fact! If he's guilty them hang him like they should have done years ago!
|
|
|
Post by xiiixiii on Jun 28, 2011 11:29:33 GMT 10
I think the NATO response to Libya is caught some where in between empathy for their lower class and the kind of dictatorship they think they should no longer have to indure , and the fear that a democracy in any arab country, not just Libya, could be bad for oil supply , or Israel , because democracy doesn't mean that people will elect leaders that share NATO intrests or those of Israel . They could easly elect leaders from the Muslim brother hood or some other religios fanatical group. I seriosly doubt that gaddafi want a true sharing of wealth , in his own country let alone all of Africa , and oil well thats possible we love cheap gas
|
|
|
Post by brillbilly on Jun 28, 2011 11:54:36 GMT 10
The whole of the middle east is being turned upside down thats for sure, and i wonder who really controls NATO?
|
|