|
Post by theshee on Nov 23, 2011 4:20:16 GMT 10
This was announced in RPP Noticias Davila anthropologist Renato Riquelme, who said that the mummy is 50 inches tall, triangular head, large cavity of the eye and molars uncommon in humans. The anthropologist Renato Riquelme Davila Andean Rituals Private Museum, located in the district of Andahuaylillas Quispicanchi province (Cusco) announced the discovery of a mummy with no human characteristics. Riquelme Davila explained that the body is 50 inches tall, triangular head, eye cavity too large, open fontanelle, which is only characteristic of children up to 1 year and has molars, which show that there is a tremendous gap that is not common in humans. "It looks not human because the head is triangular and tremendous, indeed, the head is about the size of body and thought I was a kid but Spanish and Russian doctors have come and we have confirmed that this is indeed an extraterrestrial" , said through RPP Noticias. He said it also has the front split skulls and that does not exist in any ethnic group in the world, as only found in the Andes of Peru, like the Inca bone is a triangle on the occipital and exists only in the Andes of Peru. www.rpp.com.pe/2011-11-17-cusco-hallan-momia-no-humana-en-andahuaylillas-segun-antropologo-foto_423202_6.html#swfplayerA congenital deformity, added to the head binding they used to do I would say.
|
|
|
Post by alienbeing on Nov 23, 2011 5:05:18 GMT 10
looks like homer simpson? ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 23, 2011 6:56:16 GMT 10
Now that is wierd, if its only 50 inchs tall its gotta be a kid, but they wouldnt skull bind a kid of that age, and even if they did it wouldnt have time to cause that kind of deformity before it died, and the molars seem to indicate its a lot older than a kid, if its a dwarf its the strangest one I've ever seen, with a head the same size as its body, an "authentic" DNA test might be interesting, and I'm not talking about one from Russia.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 23, 2011 6:57:14 GMT 10
I wonder how many fingers it has?
|
|
|
Post by boxfree on Nov 23, 2011 8:35:52 GMT 10
It would need DNA testing to rule out being human. I wonder if we will hear if any more renown anthropological scientists are looking at this? The eye sockets seem way too large along with everything else.
|
|
|
Post by boxfree on Nov 23, 2011 10:50:10 GMT 10
Found this..related.
|
|
|
Post by Wes Gear on Nov 23, 2011 12:25:12 GMT 10
The skull has a few things that make it strange. Could still be a deformed human.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 23, 2011 13:06:47 GMT 10
Ok, DNA testing or not, that aint human, at least not in any way we recognise it, A human born with that sort of deformity would not have that deformity restricted to just its head, therefore anything born with those sorts of problems would not have lived long in those times in those conditions.
|
|
|
Post by Wes Gear on Nov 23, 2011 19:18:07 GMT 10
It does appear to be missing a Sagittal suture.
|
|
|
Post by theshee on Nov 23, 2011 22:23:59 GMT 10
I was led to believe that they did bind children’s skulls. I still 'think' this is what has happened to this along with a deformity in the child. There is a deformity known where some children don’t have the sagittal sutere. Although the teeth look older than a Childs and the eye sockets, I know of a few child skull deformities that they can have large eye sockets.
Hell I don’t know but I would sure love to know more along with any DNA tests, for all we know it could be a hybrid. I don’t think we have heard the last of it either way.
|
|